I appreciate the info, always have. while sympathetic to frustration with the pattern of hype then letdown, that's the program, not site.
At this juncture, I'd like insight into whats being done (if anything) to "right the ship". There are experienced people in charge who surely see the problems way better than the fanbase. So, my questions for someone on the inside:
1. Why not at least mix things up for a few series at QB, maybe get a spark? Sticking with something broken isn't the behavior of serious people.
2. Why SO little creativity with offensive play calling, no change or adjustments? Run game is almost exclusively between tackles, and pass game is mostly same 3 receivers, no tight end, similar (often bunch) formations/concepts.
3. Is UM committed to recruiting QBs with elite upside, or is institutional consensus that money is better spent elsewhere, and best to get by hoping for diamonds-in-the-rough and the occasional transfer? Very risky IMO, quality transfers will be hard to come by, expensive, unfamiliar w system, and still a risk.
4. Inside of Hecht, is the goal to refine this caveman garbage and hope to win lots of close, boring games or are we witnessing Plan B in response to a QB who can't protect the ball? If so, what does Plan A look like? Which leads me to my final question...
5. Where is the finger being pointed internally? What would Zo say is the problem? Is it all TVD? How much culpability is recognized for Mario and Dawson? Could there be an OC change under consideration?
More questions than I planned and probably most are not answerable, but any insight on what's going on internally along these lines would be very interesting and appreciated.