Perez was the weak link from the outset. But the media needed to pounce on her before she sensed how vulnerable she was, before the bar review was launched and when she was insisting, "I did nothing wrong." That was Miami's best chance for the NCAA's case to fall apart. Now they've waded through a few weeks of embarrassment, which is nothing new to them. At this point you'll get nothing but a cautionary version from Perez, if anything publicly at all. The information in the OP is from the third party review, which she had to participate in.
Julie Roe Lach is a young professional, with some larceny at heart. A couple of weeks ago I posted some old quotes from her, in which she said transparency was the goal while at the same time saying the NCAA needed to find ways to differentiate between what was legally available to them while finding ways to work around what was not legally available. That delicious quote just happened to source from late fall 2011, the same time frame as Roe Lach's decision to use and compensate Perez. Roe Lach no doubt is still widely respected and will find a willing taker. She's not going to jeopardize her career by opening her mouth against the NCAA. A few weeks ago, Perez might have blabbed simply because she didn't know any better.
somehow MEP doesn't strike me as a person who gets wiser through experience, just sayin