CanesFootball
Recruit
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2012
- Messages
- 365
but what did he do this time to get suspended?
Actually it hasn't been answered. Last time it was said he missed breakfast along with two others.
This time, nobody knows.
Actually it hasn't been answered. Last time it was said he missed breakfast along with two others.
This time, nobody knows.
The rumor/thought was that he was sitting (at least partially) for getting a personal foul in the USF game, but again, that was people guessing. I don't think anyone has said for sure.
They said he "was banged up" on ESPN3.
Not buying that
He didn't get suspended for just committing a personal foul. At the very least, he was told you do one more "thing" and you're suspended again, meaning he's hit the point where he had already done a bunch of cr@p. Golden said you don't get suspended for one thing (unless, I assume it's rape or something along those lines). I have a hard time believing he was suspended for a personal foul, but I would believe it if someone told me he mouthed off to coaches who benched him after getting the personal foul, either during the game or in practice the next week.
As for missing the UVA game, people keep saying "team breakfast" but Golden said "team meeting." Now, there is a chance the breakfast served as a team meeting, but I have a hard time believing he just missed the morning cheerios and missed a game for it. Now, also, again, this could have been the 9th "thing" he missed or something like that, and it just happened to be a team breakfast.
Point? He's being suspended for a pattern of behavior, but a lot of people are focusing on the one event that is either being reported as the reason, or people are guessing is the reason. Fact is, there isn't a reason, there are reasons.
He didn't get suspended for just committing a personal foul. At the very least, he was told you do one more "thing" and you're suspended again, meaning he's hit the point where he had already done a bunch of cr@p. Golden said you don't get suspended for one thing (unless, I assume it's rape or something along those lines). I have a hard time believing he was suspended for a personal foul, but I would believe it if someone told me he mouthed off to coaches who benched him after getting the personal foul, either during the game or in practice the next week.
As for missing the UVA game, people keep saying "team breakfast" but Golden said "team meeting." Now, there is a chance the breakfast served as a team meeting, but I have a hard time believing he just missed the morning cheerios and missed a game for it. Now, also, again, this could have been the 9th "thing" he missed or something like that, and it just happened to be a team breakfast.
Point? He's being suspended for a pattern of behavior, but a lot of people are focusing on the one event that is either being reported as the reason, or people are guessing is the reason. Fact is, there isn't a reason, there are reasons.
I don't think anyone was thinking he got suspended solely b/c of a personal foul, but rather that it was the tipping point if you will. Thank you for expanding on it though.
He didn't get suspended for just committing a personal foul. At the very least, he was told you do one more "thing" and you're suspended again, meaning he's hit the point where he had already done a bunch of cr@p. Golden said you don't get suspended for one thing (unless, I assume it's rape or something along those lines). I have a hard time believing he was suspended for a personal foul, but I would believe it if someone told me he mouthed off to coaches who benched him after getting the personal foul, either during the game or in practice the next week.
As for missing the UVA game, people keep saying "team breakfast" but Golden said "team meeting." Now, there is a chance the breakfast served as a team meeting, but I have a hard time believing he just missed the morning cheerios and missed a game for it. Now, also, again, this could have been the 9th "thing" he missed or something like that, and it just happened to be a team breakfast.
Point? He's being suspended for a pattern of behavior, but a lot of people are focusing on the one event that is either being reported as the reason, or people are guessing is the reason. Fact is, there isn't a reason, there are reasons.
I don't think anyone was thinking he got suspended solely b/c of a personal foul, but rather that it was the tipping point if you will. Thank you for expanding on it though.
no, based on some posters' comments, they do think he got suspended for that.