The game didn't sell out in NC last year either, genius. The Clemson-Pitt game sold 7,000 fewer tickets than the Clemson-Miami game the year before.
The point was to show that it is a mathematical impossibility for even a sellout attendance in Orlando or Jacksonville to exceed the sellout attendance in Charlotte. Which I proved.
I freely acknowledge that the ACC-CG attendance is predicated on the teams, NOT THE LOCATION. Thus, there is NO REASON to put the game in Charlotte every year if the attendance is based on THE TEAMS, and not the location. You can move the game around, and you will have a sellout anywhere you play, if you just have 2 solid teams.
The first game in Jacksonville was a sellout because F$U was playing. The very next year, Wake played GaTech, and 10,000 fewer tickets were sold. The next year, BC played VaTech, and another 10,000 fewer tickets were sold. The very next year IN TAMPA, there was a BC-VaTech rematch, which sold just as many tickets in Tampa as were sold in Jax. The final game in Tampa was Clemson-GaTech, with the lowest attendance of all.
All games played in Charlotte have featured either Clemson or F$U from the Atlantic, with either Clemson or F$U winning all but 1. For F$U, 1 of the 4 Charlotte games was a sellout. For Clemson, 3 of the 4 Charlotte games was a sellout.
The reality is that the only guarantee of a football sellout in Charlotte is if Clemson plays. So if the location does not guarantee the sellout, there is no reason not to move the ACC-CG around.