canecountry3
Senior
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 2,488
Just to touch on Awsi Dooger's solid post...
Empty backfield sets are even more mind numbing when you have an RB (Crawford mostly, Clements may have been out there once) and a TE out wide. Does Miami not have 5 WRs they can put out there to at least give the impression there are 5 realistic targets?
That empty set look was consistently horrid, especially when you have a QB who cannot go through progressions and is a one read and fire type of QB. My god, split 4 WR out and keep an RB in the backfield as an outlet.
Empty backfield sets are even more mind numbing when you have an RB (Crawford mostly, Clements may have been out there once) and a TE out wide. Does Miami not have 5 WRs they can put out there to at least give the impression there are 5 realistic targets?
That empty set look was consistently horrid, especially when you have a QB who cannot go through progressions and is a one read and fire type of QB. My god, split 4 WR out and keep an RB in the backfield as an outlet.