You mean the same player we always take that never works out. Bold theory.
But what Im literally saying though is there is no way we aren't going to dilute the depth of talent on a Percentage basis. You're saying no more than a handful, but a handful today is not the same as a handful last year now that we have an additional 20 scholarships. WE were always going to take some developmental pieces - especially on the OL and DL period. Now we have another 20 scholarships to go around, it's going to happen more.
That's why I said as long as the total number of blue chips is generally remaining the same, the percentage could be going from 60% to 50% and still be relatively the same outcome since ultimately there are only 22 starters and max of 50-60 players total that really see the field in any given year.
This! Usually when freshman are mentioned all over the place it’s a bad sign. This program finally has depth experience and talent lol. And kids will develop or be replacedIt's not concerning at all…Many freshmen don't get mentioned.
Gaby having influence on when Under Armour tweets things is big time.**** of a time for Gaby to drop this nugget lmao. I'm sure this is purely coincidental.
Gaby feeling the need to point that out is big time. I'm sure he retweets everything though.Gaby having influence on when Under Armour tweets things is big time.
He quoted it 5 minutes after UA tweeted it. Not like he went digging in the crates lolGaby feeling the need to point that out is big time. I'm sure he retweets everything though.
that nugget was dropped by dmoney or on here when we got him to commit though**** of a time for Gaby to drop this nugget lmao. I'm sure this is purely coincidental.
thats why im, not down on the take...he had some traits from the combine and thje pre requisite size.Okay, that generally makes sense. And this guy may fit the build of a development player. I just want our flyers to look like Njoku or Cooper or Chris Johnson or Bobby Washington. All three stars when recruited that had plus to elite measurables. If they need to stew for 2-3 years to break out, and don't necessarily pan out as often, that's okay. But we shouldn't be adding PWOs or guys with at best G5 ceilings to the roster, which is what Manny would have done.
@Dwinstitles he only 16He could be a dude we never rely on then transfer or he can turn to a good player. Signs are not favoring the take but you never know, and with the way Mario stacks who cares cause they can get replaced. This happens at elite programs as well they take dudes like this all the time. This isnt CF25 where every position is a 5 star from top to bottom, thats mad unrealistic to expect.
i know, i cant agree with everything the staff does lol. But they see something we will find out@Dwinstitles he only 16
@Dwinstitles he only 16
If they no his age then they know he’s a stash player. Just like Armando Blount is only 17 right nowWhich means we're gona have to wait three years before he's mature enough to see the field as a DT. Lucky to still be here by then