2025 DJ Pickett 5* CB from Zephyrhills Commits to LSU

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
You’re the one attacking cuck boy
Sad Happy Hour GIF
 
Advertisement
Nah I’m talking about evaluations dip****…players that would be good any college they go to…

No I didn’t say just 3 players you dip****…you have comprehension issues

Evaluating the right players.

OJ Frédérique wasn’t developed to be a starter. Just walked in to fall camp and grabbed a starting roll. He was a great evaluation.

You are the ultimate cuck boy
Wait are you seriously trying to say that OJ was ONLY an evaluation hit and Not at all a development win? What kinda of retarded thought process is that?

So in what world are you able to say anyone is developed? Is Isaiah Horton or literally any of our starting WRs development to you or were they just evalutation hits? lol.
 
Wait are you seriously trying to say that OJ was ONLY an evaluation hit and Not at all a development win? What kinda of retarded thought process is that?

So in what world are you able to say anyone is developed? Is Isaiah Horton or literally any of our starting WRs development to you or were they just evalutation hits? lol.
Yes ofc I am, he arrived and was starting right away even without a spring

Isiah Horton was developed
 
Brook, I get what you’re saying. Plenty of non-ranked/2-stars/3-stars emerge into super stardom. Cam Ward, great example.

But the data specifically shows that stars matter. It’s not really arguable. It’s quite literally a fact that a higher percentage of 5-stars become NFL players, and then top 100 kids, then top 250 kids, and so forth.

Now if you can evaluate and specifically pinpoint non-blue chip guys like OJ Frederique, you’re a beast evaluator. I tip my cap to that all day and twice on Sundays. But to say that stars don’t equal talent, that I wholeheartedly disagree with. Every single national champion in the last 15+ years has had a certain % of blue chips on their roster. It’s not a coincidence.
So then why the **** are yall arguing that we aren't recruiting well after finishing 7th then 4th last year? Do yall even read what you guys write?
 
Advertisement
It matters. Kids want to play top matchups in packed stadiums.

Miami gets maybe 1 sellout a year.

They need to find a way to get tickets to youth teams, outreach programs, homeless, **** I don’t care anyone who will show up and make noise.

It’s a shame more don’t support the team but it will always been a problem until they start winning Championships
Yeah I didn’t mean it didn’t matter to the kids. I was talking for me personally

It absolutely ******* matters I agree
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
It matters. Kids want to play top matchups in packed stadiums.

Miami gets maybe 1 sellout a year.

They need to find a way to get tickets to youth teams, outreach programs, homeless, **** I don’t care anyone who will show up and make noise.

It’s a shame more don’t support the team but it will always been a problem until they start winning Championships
Just the nature of Miami in sports lol, there's a million other things to do, especially when the canes have been completely mediocre for the better part of the last 20 years, but when its really rolling you get atmospheres like 2017 Notre Dame.
 
Brook, I get what you’re saying. Plenty of non-ranked/2-stars/3-stars emerge into super stardom. Cam Ward, great example.

But the data specifically shows that stars matter. It’s not really arguable. It’s quite literally a fact that a higher percentage of 5-stars become NFL players, and then top 100 kids, then top 250 kids, and so forth.

Now if you can evaluate and specifically pinpoint non-blue chip guys like OJ Frederique, you’re a beast evaluator. I tip my cap to that all day and twice on Sundays. But to say that stars don’t equal talent, that I wholeheartedly disagree with. Every single national champion in the last 15+ years has had a certain % of blue chips on their roster. It’s not a coincidence.
What I'm saying is it's allot of politics. Yes those champions especially over the last 15 years will have a higher blue chip ranking. But they get those rankings in large part because they're bought. There's a reason these sites are private. Not necessarily ones like this. But the scouts,the rivals,the on 3, the ESPN etc. there's allot of money in this stuff. Just the same way you have all these sec & big 10 schools no matter of how good they actually are constantly at the top of rankings it's the same for recruiting. In polls they keep them throughout the top 25,top 10,top 5 because it gives there front runners, quality wins & balances quality losses. The ACC a loss means far more because you don't have all these teams ranked like this. I'm not gonna get into what people believe it they think sec football top to BOTTOM, Is amazing or not. It's not relevant. But that's the method. Same thing happens in recruiting. Just go look up the recruiting budgets & the roster spends on those teams in the sec & the big 10. When they recruit a kid if he's not highly rated it effects their top end. It effects class rankings,it effects what boosters & nil is willing to spend. How do they counter it? By paying all of these sights for inflated rankings. This is a fact. Not some conspiracy theory. So obviously they're gonna have the higher blue chip ratio because they play with a stacked deck. Most of these kids what differentiates them is in their heads & their habits. No recruiting sight and their rankings reflects that.
 
So was Ruben Bain development? He didn't start right away.
No he wasn’t a development haha, he was a highly rated recruit that should have been a 5 star and everyone knew it

But he’s going to have to be developed if he wants to reach his full potential, they’re gonna need to kick him inside next year

Just ask Greg Marks, he has the same opinion as me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
Back
Top