- Joined
- Jun 10, 2012
- Messages
- 1,908
Will be visited by the coaches on Thursday.
BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.
BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.
With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.
Actually a Cane fan, that is on most of the boards......BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.
With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.
I'm almost 100% certain Bobbydigius is a Gator poster from Shadows board. It looks like she found her way here to troll.
BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.
With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.
The difference being #6 is a much better player, 2 years younger, and more versatile. I was under the impression that what we needed from Bond was to be a pass rushing threat that can come in and help immediately. With that size he would be a situational pass rusher at best. I was hoping for the 6'3 235 measurables Rivals had posted in his profile.BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.
With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.
I don't like Matthew Thomas either.
How is 6'2 230 for a LB undersized?
How is 6'2 230 for a LB undersized?
How is 6'2 230 for a LB undersized?
The difference being #6 is a much better player, 2 years younger, and more versatile. I was under the impression that what we needed from Bond was to be a pass rushing threat that can come in and help immediately. With that size he would be a situational pass rusher at best. I was hoping for the 6'3 235 measurables Rivals had posted in his profile.BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.
With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.
I don't like Matthew Thomas either.
The difference being #6 is a much better player, 2 years younger, and more versatile. I was under the impression that what we needed from Bond was to be a pass rushing threat that can come in and help immediately. With that size he would be a situational pass rusher at best. I was hoping for the 6'3 235 measurables Rivals had posted in his profile.BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.
With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.
I don't like Matthew Thomas either.