Devante Bond

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.

With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.

I'm almost 100% certain Bobbydigius is a Gator poster from Shadows board. It looks like she found her way here to troll.
Actually a Cane fan, that is on most of the boards......
Dont get why I got your panties in a bunch here, just stated an opinion, if you disagree fine, but I think the kid is a bit undersized.
 
Advertisement
BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.

With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.

I don't like Matthew Thomas either.
The difference being #6 is a much better player, 2 years younger, and more versatile. I was under the impression that what we needed from Bond was to be a pass rushing threat that can come in and help immediately. With that size he would be a situational pass rusher at best. I was hoping for the 6'3 235 measurables Rivals had posted in his profile.
 
Advertisement
BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.

With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.

I don't like Matthew Thomas either.
The difference being #6 is a much better player, 2 years younger, and more versatile. I was under the impression that what we needed from Bond was to be a pass rushing threat that can come in and help immediately. With that size he would be a situational pass rusher at best. I was hoping for the 6'3 235 measurables Rivals had posted in his profile.


And what is wrong with that? Have you seen us trying to get off the field on 3rd down?
 
BTW official size is 6'2 229 llbs. Coaches confirmed it on the visit.

With that being the case, I just dont care for the kid. I feel a second year McCord and possibly even Holiett would be just as effective.

I don't like Matthew Thomas either.
The difference being #6 is a much better player, 2 years younger, and more versatile. I was under the impression that what we needed from Bond was to be a pass rushing threat that can come in and help immediately. With that size he would be a situational pass rusher at best. I was hoping for the 6'3 235 measurables Rivals had posted in his profile.

So he won't be able to add 5 pounds in 3 months? Or is it the 1 inch you're hung up on? Come on man
 
Advertisement
Back
Top