So let’s recap CIS:
1st
@252cane says FSU got statistically worst as a defense w the addition of Fiske by providing stats from the Dark Web to prove his theory. So, good ole
@Rellyrell had to provide actual stats from a credible source called NCAA Statistics to show that FSU improved across the board in 10 of the 14 defensive categories in the “final stats.”
But oh no,
@252cane then said “well pal, the jokes on u b/c ur stats r faulty due to FSU slipping in Total Def.” I wanna pause right here;
Once upon a time Coach D’No was selling fans that his defense worked, highlighting that the Total Def # improved. This started my journey on fully dissecting that category “Total Def” which is predicated primarily on the total amount of yards given up on the season. That exercise from 2014 led me to realize Total Def tells a story, but not the full story which other stats do.
Anywho, back to our regularly scheduled Ether.
So
@Rellyrell provided the full context of FSU’s defensive stats prior to UGA, confirming what we all know, that FSU’s defense improved dramatically w/ the addition of Fiske across all metrics. So what does
@252cane do to combat all of this? Look above & u’ll soon see Exhibit A of circular reasoning & straw man arguments.
When stats don’t back u up, hit the emergency **** button, grab a good handful of it & throw it against the wall, & as that summa bytch slides down, shift narratives, & hope no one realizes U’ve made an *** out of urself.