Dapper or other Lawyers; thoughts on NCAA stuff

UCaneDoIt

Freshman
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
484
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/dennis-dodd/21703756/ncaa-revealed-relationship-with-shapiro-attorney-prior-to-public-disclosure

The NCAA revealed its relationship with Nevin Shapiro attorney Maria Elena Perez to lawyers involved in the Miami case in mid-January, multiple sources have told CBSSports.com.

The notification to attorneys representing Miami and coaches in the case and was made approximately a week before the NCAA went public on Jan. 23 with what it called “improper conduct” in its dealings with Perez. The NCAA is conducting an external review of his enforcement department based on that finding.

On at least one occasion last month, NCAA enforcement official LuAnn Humphrey read from a prepared statement over the phone to a person involved in the case describing the relationship with Perez. Humphrey did not take questions on the situation.

“That's how they notified they had an issue,” said a source familiar with the NCAA's notification process. “They called a meeting with each involved party and basically said, ‘We want to let you know we've discovered this issue.' They read a statement and said, ‘If you have any questions call Donald Remy.'”

Remy is the NCAA's general counsel. Sources said that the NCAA did not provide detail of Elena Perez' involvement with the association. CBSSports.com reported last week that the NCAA's director of enforcement approved at least $20,000 for the use of Perez to ask questions relevant to the Miami case during a bankruptcy deposition conducted by the attorney.

The South Florida attorney is representing Shapiro, the central figure in the ongoing Miami investigation. At the same time in December 2011 she was working for Shapiro, Elena Perez was being paid to ask questions for the NCAA during a deposition she was conducting in a bankruptcy case regarding Shapiro. In essence, at that moment she would have been doing work both for Shapiro and the NCAA which was investigating her client's allegations.

Two years ago Shapiro told Yahoo! Sports he provided extra benefits to recruits and former Miami players when he was a high-rolling booster hanging around the program.

According to a source, Humphrey also told persons related to the case the NCAA was going to claim it had an attorney-client privilege with the Perez. Another source confirmed that stance by the NCAA.....

What is the point of this?
 
Advertisement
The NCAA agreed to share all information with Miami, that agreement has been violated by the NCAA. They should start all over or just settle.
 
Emmert wouldnt have confessed they f*cked up and been all ****ed off if they had an attorney client privilege.

"Whoops, my bad. We were allowed to do that after all. Back to f*ck you Miami."

And, to my knowledge, they had no client in the bankruptcy hearing
 
Advertisement
Emmert wouldnt have confessed they f*cked up and been all ****ed off if they had an attorney client privilege.

"Whoops, my bad. We were allowed to do that after all. Back to f*ck you Miami."

And, to my knowledge, they had no client in the bankruptcy hearing

He can admit to the f#ck up/fraud and still hope to keep the correspondences and words exchanged between the NCAA and Pig ***** Perez confidential. NCAA is going to do whatever it can to keep the lid on just how seedy that can of worms between it and Pig ***** Perez is.
 
Emmert wouldnt have confessed they f*cked up and been all ****ed off if they had an attorney client privilege.

"Whoops, my bad. We were allowed to do that after all. Back to f*ck you Miami."

And, to my knowledge, they had no client in the bankruptcy hearing


Good point. To claim attorney client privilege, wouldn't they have to admit she was working for them during the bankruptcy proceedings?
 
Advertisement
Don't you guys think this case has been settled between Miami & NCAA ? Now it's all a matter of how it's presented to world?
 
It would be the most myopic move of all time IF they try to claim privilege AND still try to hammer Miami.
 
Weren't they suppose to announce this **** this week?

What the **** are they waiting for?
 
Advertisement
Don't you guys think this case has been settled between Miami & NCAA ? Now it's all a matter of how it's presented to world?

I'm on this boat. At this point, both parties have an interest in getting this thing wrapped up. Miami wants to move on and the NCAA wants to save face. I fully believe the two parties will negotiate a "settlement" but it will not be presented that way. The process will be allowed to play out, but both parties will already know the outcome.
 
And if Perez isn't allowed to talk to their own investigation of the investigation, then what good is their report going to be?

Load of bull****
 
Advertisement
the NCAA can care less about Miami violations / penalties right now they are trying to decide between a

1. legit lawsuit from Miami that will cripple them or
2. take on multiple lawsuits form USC, OSU, Penn State, USF and any other program currently on probation etc.

Miami and NCAA were conducting a joint investigation. The NCAA lied to Miami and used the "joint investigation" title to only extract more info from the school but not share their findings fully. If this goes to court the NCAA will be friend within few days
 
This makes me wonder if any laws were broken. It's just weird that they went public with their relationship with Perez but now are planning to claim attorney-client privilege to keep her quiet.
 
It would be the most myopic move of all time IF they try to claim privilege AND still try to hammer Miami.

Agree. Just because they CAN claim attorney-client does not mean they SHOULD. Hiding the information would raise even more questions about the nature of the relationship, especially since not all communication between an attorney and client is actually subject to the privilege.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top