Their cases might be totally different. Or, maybe not. I never saw the particulars of a Huell-type "contract" with either of them.I want to the see if the NCAA releases a statement and whether or not VJ King or Lamar Peters are next.
Their cases might be totally different. Or, maybe not. I never saw the particulars of a Huell-type "contract" with either of them.I want to the see if the NCAA releases a statement and whether or not VJ King or Lamar Peters are next.
Okay? Just admit that your entire understanding and subsequent diagnosis of this matter was way off - and move along.
All good questions and requests. I don't think you have to actually take $$ in a case like this, though, to be declared ineligible.I want to read the NCAA's statement.
I want to know why VJ King and Lamar Peters are playing.
I want to know which bylaw was broken because Dewan never took money. Even according to the ruling.
They did.....Should never had sat him out. Let the NCAA come out and rule him ineligible
You violate the NCAA’s rule of amateurism when you sign a contract that has anything to do with why you were given a scholarship. Chad Thomas was allowed to sell beats with accompanying agreements, and he could have even signed a record deal.All good questions and requests. I don't think you have to actually take $$ in a case like this, though, to be declared ineligible.
We sent in a request to the NCAA to review his eligibility. If we don't do that, I doubt there is a ruling.They did.....
You violate the NCAA’s rule of amateurism when you sign a contract that has anything to do with why you were given a scholarship. Chad Thomas was allowed to sell beats with accompanying agreements, and he could have even signed a record deal.
That's a good point, CT. All I can think of is UM must have seen or heard something that made them feel they HAD to go this route. If that was the case and they didn't ask the NCAA for a ruling ... maybe they feared some stiffer penalty to the program itself.We sent in a request to the NCAA to review his eligibility. If we don't do that, I doubt there is a ruling.
It goes back to why the other schools didn't do the same thing?That's a good point, CT. All I can think of is UM must have seen or heard something that made them feel they HAD to go this route. If that was the case and they didn't ask the NCAA for a ruling ... maybe they feared some stiffer penalty to the program itself.
It's likely in all 3 cases the students were called in to Compliance and asked something like "what's the story here?" - We don't know of course, but if the others said "no idea what they are referring to" but Dewan said "well, I guess it was like an offer but because it was to my cousin I didn't think I needed to report it" … just that subtle a difference could account for it.It goes back to why the other schools didn't do the same thing?
Pure speculation and flawed reasoning. What is more likely is that the NCAA received the evidence of wrongdoing first and subsequently informed miami. If you think Miami would voluntarily rat itself out and sit their best player - I don’t know what to say to you.We sent in a request to the NCAA to review his eligibility. If we don't do that, I doubt there is a ruling.
Dude it came up in FBI investigation. If you dont know the facts than don't post.Pure speculation and flawed reasoning. What is more likely is that the NCAA received the evidence of wrongdoing first and subsequently informed miami. If you think Miami would voluntarily rat itself out and sit their best player - I don’t know what to say to you.
The FBI investigation didn’t determine their was a contract in place!Dude it came up in FBI investigation. If you dont know the facts than don't post.
Pure speculation and flawed reasoning. What is more likely is that the NCAA received the evidence of wrongdoing first and subsequently informed miami. If you think Miami would voluntarily rat itself out and sit their best player - I don’t know what to say to you.
An “eligibility appeal” would infer that....So you’re saying before today the NCAA declared Dewan ineligible?
An “eligibility appeal” would infer that....
What I believe happened:An “eligibility appeal” would infer that....
What I believe happened:
Miami gets word of an impending NCAA investigation and doesn’t have a good feeling about the outcome so they sit Dewan until its completed. Perhaps an “eligibility appeal” is a term for such a review - I don’t know, I’m not an expert on NCAA bylaws.