- Joined
- Apr 28, 2014
- Messages
- 16,688
And they'd be smart to. Rutgers and Maryland should barely even be receiving what ACC schools get.
And they'd be smart to. Rutgers and Maryland should barely even be receiving what ACC schools get.
And they'd be smart to. Rutgers and Maryland should barely even be receiving what ACC schools get.
View attachment 319043
Northestern, Vandy, etc......
Although how smart was Maryland in hind sight?
Crafty little turtles...
And all for a partial share for the first few years in the ACC. SMHACC Travel Takes Its Toll on Cal, Stanford
At Cal and Stanford, fall sports teams traveled tens of thousands of miles farther than their last seasons in the Pac-12.frontofficesports.com
Congrats to the
And all for a partial share for the first few years in the ACC. SMH
After seeing what happened to the PAC12, I can't believe there are people who don't think the smaller P2 schools could be on the outside looking in in the future. And it doesn't have to be with the B1G kicking them out. More than likely, it will be with Michigan, OSU, PSU, etc. leaving the B1G, kinda like the PAC12 comprised of WSU and Oregon St. In this case, it would be the B1G comprised of Indiana, Purdue, Rutgers, and Maryland.
From what I've seen online, the B1G has no exit fee and the grant of rights is just through the end of the media deal - 2030.They’re not locked into an insurmountable buyout at this point?
As opposed to how far FSU and Clemson got by suing?Sitting idly and being the GOOD partna got us NOWHERE
Ridiculous the lies we TOLD… we played this like the side CHICK and we got treated like ONE by staying quiet
There's no way to know but based on how long it takes most cases with multiple parties and complex issues, expect it to be measured in yearsDo we know when the Pac 2/Mountain West lawsuit over poaching fees will be dealt with? Depending on how that goes, could lead to the end of the Mountain West because Pac-2 plus the Mountain West 5 needs one more football school to get to the minimum of 8 teams by the end of the 2026 season, and I'm not sure if the new PAC-7 is very keen on adding Texas State from the Sun Belt.
I guess the fact that Miami was included with FSU, UNC, and Clemson with the ACC brand fund distribution was just a coincidence…Sitting idly and being the GOOD partna got us NOWHERE
Ridiculous the lies we TOLD… we played this like the side CHICK and we got treated like ONE by staying quiet
As opposed to how far FSU and Clemson got by suing?
I guess the fact that Miami was included with FSU, UNC, and Clemson with the ACC brand fund distribution was just a coincidence…
Clearly, my point went over your head but that’s fine. In due time, you will see the bigger picture with these 4 programs and ND.Congrats to US and the pity millions with 30 MILLION+ deficit
staying in the ACC was always the GOAL. Our shut mouth DEFINITELY got us fed