If the ACC is going to add Stanford and Cal, they they should go ahead and add Oregon State and Wash St. Why? Cuts down on travel costs. Leave those 4 as the "western" pod and then thereby reducing the number of cross country trips the teams have to make. Especially for non revenue sports.
Yes, but that might not take into account that (APPARENTLY) at least Stanford and SMU are willing to join the ACC "for free" or for a very low revenue share (though Cal has bigger problems, due to a MAJOR need for cash to pay its stadium financing obligations).
I know this gets forgotten sometimes...
But the STARTING point for conversations is whether a school will be admitted as a full-share member. Once Washington and Oregon offer to join the Big 10 for half-shares or Stanford-SMU offer to join the ACC for free, all bets are off.
The mathematical reality is that, yes, TECHNICALLY Stanford and SMU could enrich the ACC by increasing BOTH the ESPN "total payout" and "average payout" (assuming they take zero). However, those factors will no longer be in play the NEXT TIME we negotiate a TV deal. So, yeah, just kicking our problems down the road a bit.
At this point, there is no "let's save a few bucks on travel costs" by adding Oregon State and Washington State. Let's just say the quiet part out loud. The only chance those two schools have of joining the ACC is if they come in for free.