drifters1234
Senior
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 3,116
So this question is for anyone, whether you thought the OL did well, poor, or undetermined: What percentage of plays would the OL player need to do well on for you to consider them to have done a good job? Do they have to be perfect? I'm curious because that won't happen.
If you can't say if they did good because you don't know the play call then how can you say the did bad except for obvious plays?
Why would anyone take out the great, big plays and not take out the brain fart plays?
The concern is that our OL was supposed to be a strength this year, given their experience and talent. If that is true then we should have no problem pushing back a bottom-feeder D1 defensive line on the goalline and other short yardage situations. But we did struggle, and that is cause for concern.
Put another way, I would not expect a Wisky, OSU, Neb, or any other program w/ historically strong OLs to have any difficulty getting two yards against FAU to convert a first down or punch the ball endzone.
So if we struggle against FAU in short yardage then that does not inspire confidence that we will have success in similar situations against top 15 defenses like UF and FSU.
And what is even more troubling is that this inability to push back crappy def lines has been a problem for several years. It's - I believe - the reason Fisch resorted to the stretch plays and trickery last year rather than banging the ball up the middle to get 2 or 3 yards in a critical situation.