I didn't say physical traits are the only thing that matters, I said they matter because they do.
But people on here love to get deep in the weeds & pretend playing WR is some advanced calculus position when it's not. If a complete psychopath like Antonio Brown can play WR & thrive at it, I can assure you it's not because he has a PH.D. in football science lol. He doesn't, he was a uber talented kid who's physical traits enhanced the technical nuances that kept him around for a long time, his speed & quick feet got him paid, not because he was a savant WR.
My point is that people have downplayed Redding a great deal because he's not out there running complicated routes as if he was asked to do that IMG when everybody knows IMG has an awful offense that doesn't throw the ball much & has to rotate players in every other play to keep everyone happy.
People make it harder than is has to be, Redding checks all the boxes you want in a college ready WR, he basically has the same physical make up of a guy like AJ Brown & if he's developed here he could have a similar ceiling. If you say he's Josh Doctson, that's great! Doctson was highly productive in Jarrett Anderson's offense, if Redding even gives us half of that kinda production then he was a success.
I'm a huge fan of Smith's game too, my comparisons for him is Marqise Lee, I think he'll be very good for us as well. My whole point with Redding was just that people are way overthinking it with him & disregarding that he has every tool necessary to be a very good WR, just because he didn't play in a super complex offense that didn't require a bunch of curls, digs, hitches, bang 8's, seams, corner routes etc doesn't mean he's incapable of running those routes nor does it mean that he won't be good in college.
A smart coach worth his weight in salt can figure out what to do with a kid that has his ability.