Ethnicsands
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 22,724
You’re changing your argument and trying to switch to you’re an evaluator, which isn’t the point or issue.I did. Here are some more, bud:
Brown, who has already been named 1st team All-State in Georgia’s 7A classification TWICE, is a two year starter at a top program, after getting real reps as a freshman, is a huge winner, and a state champion who had about a 56% completion percentage his freshman and sophomore years and started for a powerhouse as an underclassman against very high level comp in GA's biggest class. If anyone did some research, they might have learned than he played a lot of his JR year injured, and his WR's were wack. The offense he plays in doesn't help much, either. There were quite a few articles today that expound on this if you're up for doing the research. Still, he had a 2-1 TD/INT ratio (14/7), and 30 total TD's and he ran for over 1100 yards. He's going to score over 100 TD's in HS at the highest level of classification in a top state.
In Sitkowski's sophomore year, at Old Bridge in NJ, against inferior comp, he had 6 total TD's. All year. Oh, and 9 INT's. And 215 total yards rushing. And under a 50% completion % against defenses that were 100% committed to stopping... the run. And didn't win crap. "Sitkowski hasn't had elite success at the high school level. He recorded just 1,190 yards and five touchdowns against 10 interceptions during his junior season at Old Bridge High School in New Jersey." Correct me if I'm wrong, but during his senior year at IMG... he got beat out.
So yeah, think about the moment after each of their junior years finished, what they each did, compare production, a winner vs a loser, the difference in comp, the recognition, etc, and any reasonable person who know what shape a football is would agree that Sitkowski's name shouldn't be anywhere near this thread. Even if Brown doesn't improve his senior year (unlikely, based on his work ethic, upside, and commitment to improving), compare his last season vs Sit getting benched at IMG. So, you know, maybe it was YOUR response that was "crazy' and maybe it was YOU that was "flat out wrong." Words matter.
Also, potato. Peace.
I was clear I didn’t like the Sit eval back when we took his commitment. And I’m on record as liking taking Brown’s commitment. But that’s neither here nor there. Because you and me ain’t debating evals and we ain’t the evaluators.
you wrote:
Let's all stop with the Sitkowski references here, please. Before he was done with HS Miami had dropped him and his best opportunity was Rutgers. He was a mistake by the staff and they realized it and course corrected. Once he was full evaluated he was perceived as a lower level prospect by all of CFB outside of E. Brunswick, NJ.
This comment makes no sense. We took Sit’s commitment after seeing him live in person, and we didn’t drop him until his senior year, which Brown hasn’t even had yet. So your argument that there’s no comparison doesn’t hold up. We’ll see. I’m not complaining - my view is clear here. But folks fall all over themselves to differentiate the two. The ‘difference’ is only two things. 1, evaluation, and 2, fall-back potential at a different position.