Change in Scheme

coaches putting players in positions to succeed not just the "playbook"

http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2013/story/_/id/10286019/2013-nfl-playoffs-leaders-not-gurus-achieve-most-success-league

This doesn't mean the Redskins or anyone else who is combing the offensive coordinator ranks is doing it wrong. But it is a reminder about where coaching-search priorities should lie. You don't hire a head coach because you like his playbook. You hire him because you believe he's a leader of men. Nothing he draws up matters long-term if he doesn't also come with the ability to motivate professional football players to put it into practice.

"We spend a lot of time as a staff talking about that: What's the best way to teach our guys?" Kelly told me in July after an Eagles training camp practice. "Because the bottom line is it means absolutely nothing what we know because we're not the ones playing."

Kelly's success in 2013 had more to do with his ability to connect with his players and get them to buy in than it did with his offensive schemes. His is clearly a highly intelligent, nimble and thoughtful football mind. But he also showed in his first year as an NFL coach that he grasps the most important of coaching concepts. You build your system to fit your people, not vice versa. Only by working to connect with and understand your players can you figure out the best way to make them -- and yourself -- successful.

The four remaining playoff coaches demonstrate this. Long before he won games with Peyton Manning, Fox took the Jake Delhomme-quarterbacked Panthers to the Super Bowl. Two years ago, when Kyle Orton flopped, Fox rebuilt the Broncos' offense around Tim Tebow in midseason and got to the second round of the playoffs. Belichick has won with teams that set passing records, with dink-and-dunk teams, with defensive teams. He won 11 games with Matt Cassel the year Tom Brady blew out his knee in Week 1.

At USC and now in Seattle, Carroll has become famous for the environment he's created around his team -- a relaxed, upbeat and encouraging football environment in which the cream rises because highly skilled people are put in positions to help themselves and each other succeed. His program is football's version of Google. Harbaugh is quite clearly a maniac, but he's so wholly invested in the role that his players embrace him for his authenticity. He can win with a maxed-out Alex Smith or a developing Colin Kaepernick.

"One thing Tony Dungy told me is that, if you can make individual players better, then they're going to listen," Kelly told me. "So I think when you're dealing with anybody, no matter what business it is, if people understand that you care about them and you want to help them, then I think they're going to take to it."
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
You can't overhaul your defensive phlilosophy that you need a MINIMUM of 22 guys to "master"... on a whim.. you can get 6-8 dudes to play zone in basketball without too much.


Golden and Co are taking the saban approach.. this is my defense, we're going to get guys that fit the system, and when we do, we'll be good.. Short term, that's not great, long term it's much better..

oh and that would go against everything al believes in.. he's teaching you how to do things the right way to succeed in his system.. that would all go down the tubes if he's teaching a system to keep up with the (lack of) talent we've had.
Bull****.

FSU made the switch from the 3-4 midseason. They even changed Christian Jones position after the season had started.

It can be done. Our guys are either too stubborn or too stupid to do it.

**** Ridler what are you doing bringing a fact based example to the argument.
 

280.gif
 
I don't think the coaches are going to change just because others are. They are trying to run a defense that they think works better with the guys that they have. But don't get me wrong I want a change in the defense but I think they are stuck figuring out what will work with our group of guys.

It's taken them four years to figure that out? The D is worst in the ACC but they still insist on doing the same thing. The definition of insanity...

Oh I know! Trust me I'm aware. I don't think we are where we are supposed to be. I am not gonna stand here defending D'Onofrio but this was about coaching schemes. That's how a coaching scheme works and is developed...
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
I don't think the coaches are going to change just because others are. They are trying to run a defense that they think works better with the guys that they have. But don't get me wrong I want a change in the defense but I think they are stuck figuring out what will work with our group of guys.

Completely false. That is why a majority of golden sunshine pumpers keep stating wait till he has his recruits here...

How is this false? Please explain...so your telling me that just because it works for someone else means it is going to work for you?
 
Last edited:
Coach L is a seasoned, old vet coach, in a sport that is significantly less complex than football. Golden can't change the system bc he doesn't know anything else. In football it's not as simple as "we'll just play man coverage".

Why? Randy Shannon was one of the least creative defensive coordinators we've ever had. We played the same fvckin coverage all season. 99% man press coverage with 2 high.

This simplicity, coupled with the fact that it fit the talent pool in Miami, is why Shannon was so successful as a DC.

Some will say well we had NFL talent everywhere... but it had to be developed. And in that simple system individual player development happened at a much faster rate.

How many guys on defense are getting better under this staff?
 
Advertisement
Back
Top