CB Xavier Lucas is transferring to Miami

[Odysseus]

“To any and all Wisconsin boosters, how much do you love your family?”

That's exactly what he said. Look how fast he got freed at Heatherman was hired lol

 

[pubmedu]

Spoiler: Go Canes!

 

[Odysseus]

 

[Damiencane86]

View attachment 318044
View attachment 318050View attachment 318053
View attachment 318088

Spoiler: Go Canes!

View attachment 318062View attachment 318063View attachment 318064View attachment 318065View attachment 318066View attachment 318067View attachment 318069View attachment 318070View attachment 318074View attachment 318076View attachment 318077View attachment 318084View attachment 318085

 

[TheOriginalCane]

Admitting to doing something illegal. Hilarious.

 

[JamesQuall]

**** yea.

Welcome to the club young man. Secondary shaping up really nice.

If we can get a decent nickel and a competent safety we'll be *******

 

[k9cane]

well, we wanted/need change...

we got change

 

[TheOriginalCane]

So, just to clarify for myself and anyone else who is wrapping their brain around this whole situation,

- IF the revenue sharing proposal passes, Wisconsin technically owns Lucas's NIL rights for two years since he signed a contract NOW, when there wasn't any actual legal reason they could have him do so...

- Until that happens, Miami can have him participate in NIL with their collective.

- It would seem that there could be further legal wrangling down the road should Congress finally pass the revenue sharing agreement.

- I know the contract he signed was given to all BIG10 schools to use. Is it legal? Or would that be the main point of any future litigation?

Nope. Wrong.

Wisconsin does not own Lucas's NIL rights for two years. Any future "revenue-sharing" agreements will be based upon things like TV rights money and merchandise sales. It is not some exclusive deal that can prevent Lucas from going out and signing a deal with, say, Bose.

More importantly, the revenue sharing deals (eventually) will be predicated up enrollment at that school (thus, your ability to share in the revenue of that school that you and your sport help to generate). Revenue-sharing deals cannot prevent a student from transferring.

Finally, I'm not sure why people think you can sign a contract for something that is not yet a legally allowable matter (revenue-sharing). I mean, if you want to get ahead of things, you can always draft the contract, and you can always put it in front of someone. But even if they sign it, they are going to need to ratify it again once the particular subject matter comes into legal existence. Which, at this current moment, "revenue sharing" is not yet a thing.

 

[CoastCane]

Lucas ran a 10.48 100-meter time at 6-2, 200-pounds as a senior

and we still failed to offer until late...smh.. glad we got him now

 

[Suhrthing]

Free at last, free at least, thank God almighty - free at last.

 

[RozayCane]

 

[Yoyo423]

Been saying for several weeks he just needed to enroll as a student and figure out the athletic and transfer grade/classes stuff later.

The NCAA has no teeth here and Wisconsin can't do anything to make him stay at Wisconsin.

I doubt he could legally sign away his NIL right to the school when revenue sharing hasn't been officially signed yet. Shame on Wisconsin for pressuring/manipulating a teenager into signing a TWO year document that isn't even legitimate and then using that against him like a week later. Xavier never should have signed it but Fickell and Wisconsin knew what they were trying to do was shady.

 

[1mg of Epi]

The portal is just an easy way for schools and players to find each other. Was it supposed to be more than that?

 

[ristwasdown]

Nope. Wrong.

Wisconsin does not own Lucas's NIL rights for two years. Any future "revenue-sharing" agreements will be based upon things like TV rights money and merchandise sales. It is not some exclusive deal that can prevent Lucas from going out and signing a deal with, say, Bose.

More importantly, the revenue sharing deals (eventually) will be predicated up enrollment at that school (thus, your ability to share in the revenue of that school that you and your sport help to generate). Revenue-sharing deals cannot prevent a student from transferring.

Finally, I'm not sure why people think you can sign a contract for something that is not yet a legally allowable matter (revenue-sharing). I mean, if you want to get ahead of things, you can always draft the contract, and you can always put it in front of someone. But even if they sign it, they are going to need to ratify it again once the particular subject matter comes into legal existence. Which, at this current moment, "revenue sharing" is not yet a thing.

View attachment 318092

On your second paragraph. Question. Say the ruling happens. And the contracts require you to be at that institution.

If the contract is predicated on you enrolling. And you choose not to. I'm assuming it goes to court? A court can either force one to honor contract or award compensary damages. I doubt a court is going to enforce one to honor. What the heck would the damages look like?

 

[Canes Legacy]

 

[TriStarCane]

**** I got this for the Canes and Roki Sasaki to my Dodgers in like an hour. I hope the offseason never ends

 

[PalyCane]

 

[jed2410]

Salty as a Saltine...

View attachment 318080

Actual questions here

1. Since the house settlement hasn't been approved shouldn't signing a contract for NIL directly with a school/conference violate existing NCAA rules?

2. Can you enforce a contract today that is predicated on revenue sharing that isn't legal yet?

 

[DC3]

I’m one big time WR in the spring portal away from telling some major lies

Yall boys ready

 

[CanesFan20]

Wonder who the new DB coach will be. Outside of OL, that's probably the most important position coach on staff.