- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 24,031
It's both.MTSU would be an underdog vs VT. My point is it’s the coaches more then the players & it always has been. Don’t forget that!
It's both.MTSU would be an underdog vs VT. My point is it’s the coaches more then the players & it always has been. Don’t forget that!
Coaches weren’t getting burned for 4 sixty yard TDsMTSU would be an underdog vs VT. My point is it’s the coaches more then the players & it always has been. Don’t forget that!
If Mario lets Van Dyke air it out on that second drive, we probably put up 7 instead of 3. Stats are nice, but we need to put up points. Our defense is still suspect.Not sure how anybody is complaining about the offense..
2 drives
161 yards
10 points
Coaches went into MTSU stubborn and said WE WILL get this working this week. I’d say it wasn’t until the 3rd quarter they realized they had foooked up badlyIt's both.
A lot of people looking at results and not what’s causing them“Sustained long drive” bro that drive had 2 good plays called back because of penalties and featured a 26+ yard throw to Mallory. This isn’t 3 yards and a cloud of dust would you shut up with the negativity pls
Yes they were.Coaches weren’t getting burned for 4 sixty yard TDs