Canes vs. NC State

[YUMU]

What are we looking at here?

2001 team
All wearing #26
RIP ST26

 

[OldhamA]

What are we looking at here?

The 2001 team in Sean Taylor jerseys.

 

[PIPO]

Should not be targeting

 

[Rellyrell]

No lie; I’m tired of the targeting rule.

 

[SFbayCane]

Im fluent in ACC Ref language, allow me to translate:


The previous play is under review for targeting translates to "A tobacco road team was on their heels, we need to give them a free timeout to collect themselves."

 

[CanesZ06]

That's not targeting but I hope they call it

 

[Negro-Wan Kanobi]

What are we looking at here?

Hitting him in the head

 

[Theu954]

SURPRISE NCSTATE ISNT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE BLITZ ITS WORKED EVERYTIME **** NEAR

 

[chalupe71]

that would be targeting of we did it...just saying

 

[TC@ne]

As much as I’d love the free yards, no penalty there

 

[TemplarCane]

No targeting.

 

[RaisingCane26]

As soon as we stop playing press they match right down the field. Good God Manny can the answer be any more obvious.

 

[PredaCane]

MANNYS FACE HE SEES THE COLLAPSE COMING

Naw some of yall are just hoping for one.

 

[Deleted member 23667]

Awww chit this better not end up being another close game.

 

[Macca21]

So was my statement…

Ahhhh, gotcha. My bad Cajun

 

[Suhrthing]

Not targeting, but AC would be called.

 

[OldhamA]

I mean that's targeting by the stupid application of the rules they have. He closelines Smith there.

It's not, obviously.

 

[dycane]

Ashlee is transitioning. Next year he’ll be solid.

 

[OleCane]

Somebody mentioned that George should not have fielded that punt inside the 5 and he did it because he was young. But truth is the Canes have aloways fielded that ball inside the 10 the Canes are not taught situational football period.

 

[streetja]

We needlessly rotate at every stupid position possible but not at RB… make it make sense