FullyERicht
Thunderdome
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 5,591
It's a simple pattern that was laughably predictable.
New coach gets hired, positive energy around the program, guy is a young exciting new face. Recruits hard, convinces kids to be the future.
After the first year, he does poorly on the field, but everyone gives a pass b/c "its the old coach's fault".
Second year, mild improvement, but a few kids start to see through the promises.
When the third year comes and you get dominated in the citrus bowl by a mediocre squad, after you **** the bed at the end of the season, kids don't buy in anymore, and it's easy for other schools to point to the lack of success. At that point, you are lost.
I hoped Golden was a program builder coach. I assumed bc he turned Temple around, and a few kids made the NFL, that he was a scouting and development guy at worst, who was great at convincing the kids he scouted to come.
In reality, he is an ELITE politician/recruiter. And that's great, but if you don't win, nobody buys the sales pitch, no matter how good it sounds. None of the kids he inherited vastly improved. The offensive and defensive numbers have mostly gotten worse, and the on field results are mirror images to the last failed joke coach. Miami doesn't have the flexibility to offer kids houses right now, so the recruiting will ALWAYS suffer if the program doesn't dramatically improve after a few seasons and kids aren't getting drafted.
In my recent posts I made it clear that Miami has succeeded when our coaches were great FOOTBALL minds, not just great recruiters. Miami wasn't built on "keeping the kids home". It was built on making beasts out of those extremely talented ones who chose to stay home through elite COACHING.
New coach gets hired, positive energy around the program, guy is a young exciting new face. Recruits hard, convinces kids to be the future.
After the first year, he does poorly on the field, but everyone gives a pass b/c "its the old coach's fault".
Second year, mild improvement, but a few kids start to see through the promises.
When the third year comes and you get dominated in the citrus bowl by a mediocre squad, after you **** the bed at the end of the season, kids don't buy in anymore, and it's easy for other schools to point to the lack of success. At that point, you are lost.
I hoped Golden was a program builder coach. I assumed bc he turned Temple around, and a few kids made the NFL, that he was a scouting and development guy at worst, who was great at convincing the kids he scouted to come.
In reality, he is an ELITE politician/recruiter. And that's great, but if you don't win, nobody buys the sales pitch, no matter how good it sounds. None of the kids he inherited vastly improved. The offensive and defensive numbers have mostly gotten worse, and the on field results are mirror images to the last failed joke coach. Miami doesn't have the flexibility to offer kids houses right now, so the recruiting will ALWAYS suffer if the program doesn't dramatically improve after a few seasons and kids aren't getting drafted.
In my recent posts I made it clear that Miami has succeeded when our coaches were great FOOTBALL minds, not just great recruiters. Miami wasn't built on "keeping the kids home". It was built on making beasts out of those extremely talented ones who chose to stay home through elite COACHING.