Barry Jackson on D'Onofrio

nystateofmind

C'est la vie
Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
16,298
SUNDAY BUZZ COLUMN

UM defensive coordinator Mark D'Onofrio sits inside his cocoon, focused solely on improving his unit while ignoring searing criticism from fans and former Hurricanes players.

Over the past three months, D'Onofrio has been subjected to scathing attacks from Warren Sapp, Eric Winston and Duane Starks, and subtle shots from others, including former cornerback Phillip Buchanon.

Buchanon thanked Sapp for ripping D'Onofrio on Twitter and then tweeted: "The truth about Al Folden."￾

D'Onofrio said Saturday he hadn't known about any of this. He said he wasn't aware any of these players had said anything about him.

"I'm not going to worry about that," he said. "The guys in the building understand what we're doing. I can only worry about coaching the guys here and trying to get them to execute at a higher level."

To refresh, here's what the former UM standouts have said:

### Sapp: "The D coordinator is killing my school. That looks like no Miami defense in the history of our school... Don't talk to me about Al Golden and whatever the d-coordinator's name is. You don't ever hire someone you can't fire. That's the golden rule."

### Starks: “Miami is being outcoached [defensively] every week. They’re predictable. There’s no disguising. It’s embarrassing. I would get rid of some people. If you can’t coach good talent, there’s a problem.”

### Winston said D’Onofrio’s “scheme is brutal. Too bland, too vanilla. No imagination on his part.”

He said UM’s defense looks unprepared and “I don’t think it’s completely a personnel problem. There are some X’s and O’s things that aren’t smart. Al better be willing to ride or die with the guy. You will get to a point where your assistants will take you down. It upsets a lot of people knowing how close [friends] they are. If [D’Onofrio] was a **** of a coach, nobody would care. That’s not the case.”

Do Golden and UM athletic director Blake James dismiss this D’Onofrio criticism from former players as irrelevant or does it genuinely both them? They answered this way:

### Golden: "They played here. They have a right to say what they want to say. But at the same time, we've had a lot of coaches and players here that have been through a very difficult period. I know they are passionate about the program and the defense, but we are equally as passionate."

### James: “We all want our team to continue to improve in all phases… I love the passion that our former student athletes have for their program and at the same time recognize no one wants to play championship football more than our coaches and current student athletes.”

Keep in mind D’Onofrio is running the system Golden wants. And Golden remains committed to that system and to D’Onofrio, who said Saturday that UM will run both a 4-3 and 3-4 this season. Linebacker Denzel Perryman said UM "may change a little something" in its defensive approach but "I don't think it's going to be anything major."￾

Some former and current Hurricanes praise D'Onofrio publicly and privately, saying they’re well prepared and that he’s not responsible for the avalanche of defensive breakdowns over the past two seasons.

But some players wish D'Onofrio would play more man-to-man defense, blitz more and be more receptive to player suggestions.

Some Board of Trustees members are unhappy with D’Onofrio, according to a high-ranking trustee, but the UM administration never asked Golden to consider replacing him. A person who has coached on UM’s staff during D’Onofrio’s tenure said he believes D’Onofrio’s system should be simplified.

Give D’Onofrio credit for being more creative and bold in the Russell Athletic Bowl, including a blitz from Deon Bush that resulted in a safety. But UM still allowed 554 yards in a 36-9 loss to Louisville.

And despite a strong start, UM finished in the bottom half of the country in every key statistical category in 2013: 65th of 123 teams in scoring defense (26.8), 77th in run defense (176 yards per game), 88th in third-down conversion defense (31.9 percent success rate for opposing offenses, 45 percent in the final month), 89th in total defense (426.4 yards per game), 90th in pass defense (249.8), and 108th in fourth-down conversion defense (14 of 21 successful).

Former UM assistant coach Don Soldinger said he sees nothing wrong with D’Onofrio’s system. What bothers him is this: “You don’t see guys swarming to the football. Guys are hesitant. Sometimes, they’re not taking the right angles. I question if the effort was there for all 11 guys. Al will fix it; I think the guy is special.”

But Soldinger said “criticism that will come after this year or next will be justified” because these are Golden’s players.

Said former UM center Brett Romberg: “Seeing the same mistakes and not being able to correct it is 100 percent coaching. Either [D’Onofrio] needs to adjust or he needs to go.”

Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/spor...phins-heat-marlins-chatter.html#storylink=cpy
 
Advertisement
Nothing that most of us haven't been saying. Defense sucks and needs to improve. We have talent, no excuse to be in the bottom half this year.
 
Season 4, same results.

Might as well accept it.. We won't be any better on defense.

Question I've been asking myself is, how is the offense going to get better if they've been practicing against one of the worst defenses ever in college football?!
 
If he keeps running that ridiculous scheme....it won't even matter what talent we bring in.

There isn't a defensive end on the planet that can be asked to backpeddle into coverage and cover a jitterbug typle slot receiver. It's simple ******* physics.

Here's a thought dumb ***...if you're going to insist on running that ill-conceived cover 3 on every ******* down...at least give different looks pre-snap, you know....crowd the box and THEN drop 8. As opposed to coming out with linebackers with heels at 7-10 yards off the line scrimmage and everyone lined up in a soft, passive base look.

The biggest problem with that abortion of a scheme is that the presnap look gives away EVERYTHING. It's so obvious when we're blitzing cause these kids are being asked to blitz out of the same passive look and they can't help but start to creep up right before the snap.

Some of it is talent...but there's enough talent there NOT to give up 3500 yards over a span of 7 games. And I swear if I hear that ******* say "yards down matter" one more time....
 
Advertisement
Like any scheme, it depends on the personnel. If you can find a monster NT and some good rush OLBs, it will be very successful. Stanford's D is a 3-4 two gap D. A lot of Ds have been successful with this system. It's all about finding the pieces. It may or may not be a great cultural fit for SF athletes, but the scheme itself isn't incapable of being successful.
 
Advertisement
Stats got worse at the end of the year bc every team knew what we were gonna do. I saw no in game adjustments either. We got torched the first half and nuked on D in the second half. 2014 Dline will be much much better, like stunts and delayed blitzes that actually get pressure and tfl's. If not, there just ain't no fight in this dog.
 
Talent and experience all over this defense. Top 25 or GTFO. 50-60th is not an improvement, being average isn't ok just because you've been awful.

If you think there are even 15 more talented defenses on paper than this one, you're bat **** crazy, and us continually underperforming our talent has to be an issue at some point. This is a put up or shut up year.
 
Advertisement
If he keeps running that ridiculous scheme....it won't even matter what talent we bring in.

There isn't a defensive end on the planet that can be asked to backpeddle into coverage and cover a jitterbug typle slot receiver. It's simple ****ing physics.

Here's a thought dumb ***...if you're going to insist on running that ill-conceived cover 3 on every ****ing down...at least give different looks pre-snap, you know....crowd the box and THEN drop 8. As opposed to coming out with linebackers with heels at 7-10 yards off the line scrimmage and everyone lined up in a soft, passive base look.

The biggest problem with that abortion of a scheme is that the presnap look gives away EVERYTHING. It's so obvious when we're blitzing cause these kids are being asked to blitz out of the same passive look and they can't help but start to creep up right before the snap.

Some of it is talent...but there's enough talent there NOT to give up 3500 yards over a span of 7 games. And I swear if I hear that ******* say "yards down matter" one more time....

Here comes the Madden crowd! Ya mean all they have to do is disguise their coverages!?! Brilliant! And I don't understand people getting crazy about our D walking out lbs to cover the slot. We're not in man when we stay in our base D against 11/10 personnel so I'm not sure what you're complaining about other than not having a ******* clue what you're watching.

In no way am I happy with Coach D. I have to believe that the D will be slanting and shooting gaps more this year with bush playing down near the LOS. If not then coach needs to have his head examined. As far as more man, we did not have the corners for man in the past. Tracy is still the only one that I have complete faith in consistent man coverage. Corn and Burns will be there but Gutner will never be a man corner. Crawford looks like a JAG to me. Development of our safeties is big here too. I have never been blown away by Jenkins. Bush can be great if healthy. Hopefully Carter passes Jenkins and takes better angles and provides more consistent back end coverage.
 
D will be much better with Morris gone. They always played good in first half of games, then we're left on the field to long.
 
Advertisement
why are you guys mad with Barry? He's telling the **** truth... the coaches suck *** and if you're cane fan you should be mad...
 
These defenses under this regime have been some of the worst-executing I've ever seen. We can't run a simple stunt properly or pass receivers off in zone coverage.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top