He may not be a starter, but I don't see how a guy like Bond has a significant advantage over him. Isn't AQM bigger?
All things being equal (size, speed etc.) the guy EE and is older [Bond] usually has the advantage over the true freshman [AQM]. The thing is nothing is equal and no time is guaranteed at DE next season. A freshman has as much change as a Rd-Sr to play.
If AQM is legit and willing to work, he will get burn early...a lot of burn.
I don't see why being older is a *significant* advantage. If he were older and weighed more and had a MUCH deeper understanding of what we're trying to do (schematically), I'd concede.
I tend to agree with you that there won't be very much of an advantage. If Bond plays a lot more than AQM, it's because he beat him out on effectiveness.
My point is EE is the advantage, learning the playbook and getting in Utough is the advantage.
As for being older and coming from JUCO (
Footnote 1) that may be an advantage. The experience coming from JUCO (better competition) and the game played at a higher level (JUCO v. HS) is an advantage IMO. For some reason kids don't do well on the line (undersized, not ready for the game, not in shape etc.) and elders do a lot better (more physically ready, better shape, more experience).
By the way great clarifier "*significant*"...it is an advantage (IMO) to what degree, don't know?
I am not here to debate age, but for some reason age and experience is helpful for a team.
(Footnote 1: Remember people in JUCO leave JUCO older than HS Players)