- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 41,492
Passing would’ve interfered in their rb breaking tackles.Or maybe we like our CB depth…we just held a team to 82 yards passing.
Passing would’ve interfered in their rb breaking tackles.Or maybe we like our CB depth…we just held a team to 82 yards passing.
Shhhhhhhhhhh!!!!Passing would’ve interfered in their rb breaking tackles.
Speaking of Lou, remember when it was "Stop panicking. Lou Cristobal's scholarship will never be the reason someone else isn't a take"?I think it’s a fair post. A reclassified 16 year old went to ECU not UiF or FSU… ECU… following a girl there foolishly. That’s too much for their feelings??? We’re in desperate need of CB talent.
Good lord. I’m more offended that Lou Cristobal started the bowl game.
Speaking of Lou, remember when it was "Stop panicking. Lou Cristobal's scholarship will never be the reason someone else isn't a take"?
If we're as tight on numbers as our insiders are saying, then.. yeah.. him being on scholarship makes a difference.
Yes and I was one of those guys who didn’t think it was a big deal. If they don’t have a spot for a guy like this because of numbers then it’s certainly a big deal. I’m shocked he actually started. I don’t get that and to the rest of us it looks awful.Speaking of Lou, remember when it was "Stop panicking. Lou Cristobal's scholarship will never be the reason someone else isn't a take"?
If we're as tight on numbers as our insiders are saying, then.. yeah.. him being on scholarship makes a difference.
I honestly don't know. But I do know Mario played him in exactly 4 games.Isn’t Sweet Lou graduating? Didn’t have a problem for a one and done but if it’s more…. Not ideal.
I bet returns.I honestly don't know. But I do know Mario played him in exactly 4 games.
I honestly don't know. But I do know Mario played him in exactly 4 games.
so you’re one of those “take whoever helps you win” types.I really don’t care about the history. Jackson fills a position of need and wants to come here. Make room for him.
I was against it from the start just because I saw it far too often when I was still coaching. Some dip**** stepson would start over guys who were clearly better. I'd have players asking me why the dip**** is playing over them and I couldn't tell them the truth. Its hard to keep a teenager interested when they know they aren't starting no matter how hard they work.Yes and I was one of those guys who didn’t think it was a big deal. If they don’t have a spot for a guy like this because of numbers then it’s certainly a big deal. I’m shocked he actually started. I don’t get that and to the rest of us it looks awful.
Look at Burroughs. He's a grown *** man. Dude has been given a second chance, by his second his team. If we're keeping him around after the **** he's pulled, the mistakes Jackson made as 16 year old shouldn't disqualify him from getting another shot.so you’re one of those “take whoever helps you win” types.
It comes down to a non emotional question of - does this kid make our squad better or not next year.I’m genuinely torn on this situation. Obviously I’m not well informed, but part of me thinks “fool me once…” Another part of me thinks he was a young kid who made a mistake and he deserves a second chance.
Speaking of Lou, remember when it was "Stop panicking. Lou Cristobal's scholarship will never be the reason someone else isn't a take"?
If we're as tight on numbers as our insiders are saying, then.. yeah.. him being on scholarship makes a difference.
That’s what I’m getting at. When I coached, almost all time, the second chance kids ended up ******* us again. Sometimes they were a great story, but it was infrequent.It comes down to a non emotional question of - does this kid make our squad better or not next year.