He’s not and seems to have an affinity for uf
I'd be pretty upset if we lost Pierre. His physical talent paired with his natural instincts at the LB play is a pretty special combo. I don't care that he's listed as a 3 star -- he looks like a big time player to me.
I honestly would not care if Pierre left, but if he does then we better get Eaford because we have to sign a MIKE. I would love to finish the LB crew with Huff and the kid from GA ..
Michigan board is also saying they stopped recruiting Solomon a while ago, others are higher on their board etc. I mean, I really don't care as we would have gotten him regardless but that is what their mod reported.
Where is that film? I seen his jr highlights and wasn't that impressed.Pierre looks like a special MLB on tape, we need to recruit him harder if he is looking.
I wonder if he was reporting that before he committed to usI honestly would not care if Pierre left, but if he does then we better get Eaford because we have to sign a MIKE. I would love to finish the LB crew with Huff and the kid from GA ..
Michigan board is also saying they stopped recruiting Solomon a while ago, others are higher on their board etc. I mean, I really don't care as we would have gotten him regardless but that is what their mod reported.
Agreed. Dont want to lose him. I think he gets lost in the convo because he committed so early, but dude is talented and deserves a spot.I'd be pretty upset if we lost Pierre. His physical talent paired with his natural instincts at the LB play is a pretty special combo. I don't care that he's listed as a 3 star -- he looks like a big time player to me.
Well Id love to have 5 if we are talking about Huff, Davis and either Brown or Eaford (Eaford prob more..havent seen tape on those 2 but from what Ive read, Eaford may be different skillset that will make this group more well rounded). But for $hits and giggles, where is the room? I feel like these numbers are close to accurate of how it will go down..and thats a big class at 28 which is getting dicey. So unless we are planning on signing more than 28, not sure where we can subtract to make room for a 5th LB(unless you consider one of them a hybrid than can rush the edge and count him towards the 7 DL).There is room.
28 sounds about right.Well Id love to have 5 if we are talking about Huff, Davis and either Brown or Eaford (Eaford prob more..havent seen tape on those 2 but from what Ive read, Eaford may be different skillset that will make this group more well rounded). But for $hits and giggles, where is the room? I feel like these numbers are close to accurate of how it will go down..and thats a big class at 28 which is getting dicey. So unless we are planning on signing more than 28, not sure where we can subtract to make room for a 5th LB(unless you consider one of them a hybrid than can rush the edge and count him towards the 7 DL).
QB = 1
RB = 2
TE = 2
OL = 4
WR = 2
DT/DE = lets say 7 between the 2 positions
LB = 4
CB = 3
SF = 2
Athlete...aka Richards = 1
Well Id love to have 5 if we are talking about Huff, Davis and either Brown or Eaford (Eaford prob more..havent seen tape on those 2 but from what Ive read, Eaford may be different skillset that will make this group more well rounded). But for $hits and giggles, where is the room? I feel like these numbers are close to accurate of how it will go down..and thats a big class at 28 which is getting dicey. So unless we are planning on signing more than 28, not sure where we can subtract to make room for a 5th LB(unless you consider one of them a hybrid than can rush the edge and count him towards the 7 DL).
QB = 1
RB = 2
TE = 2
OL = 4
WR = 2
DT/DE = lets say 7 between the 2 positions
LB = 4
CB = 3
SF = 2
Athlete...aka Richards = 1