Edouard has a VERY high ceiling. He also is very raw and has a pretty low floor. He does have a lot of the potential strengths of Bridgewater. But, Bridgewater produced A LOT more at the HS level. Edouard is a talent, but he is not as good of a prospect coming out as TB because TB was less risky. Edouard is a great talent to take as a 2nd QB along with a guy like Kaaya who seems to me a more proven commodity. I really like how our QB class looks right now
dude TB went to miami northwestern of course the production level will be higher
Really? He went to MNW? Wow, didn't know that! Tell me more!
I like Eduoard. I was one of the first people to defend his lower production because he has great tools as a prospect. That doesn't mean the lower production is not something to keep account of and consider.
Guess what? A lot of QBs that don't go to MNW and that play with less talent, complete over 50% of their passes
but production doesnt translate to the college game. we see players increase production and decrease production thats a variable thats not fair to judge in a QB on the high school level
Fair?
Every variable is fair to judge a HS QB prospect on. Especially a variable that indicates the success the QB has been able to have in doing what he is receiving a scholarship to do against HS competition. I fully believe that too much stock cannot be put into HS production for a QB. I don't want to just take the guy who threw for the most yards and call it a day. But, you can't say you don't like seeing that Kaaya completes over 70% of his passes. Then you watch his tape and see him going through progressions and it seems apparent that he is advanced in his mental game for the HS level. Does that mean Kaaya will complete 70% of his passes in college? I don't know, doubtful though. But, it does mean that there is basis to discuss the possibility that one of his strengths may be the mental part of the game, and that can provide hope in projecting him further in terms of getting over the hurdles of adjusting to the mental burden of the college game for a QB in a pro style system.
We are all recruiting junkies. And that entails getting to know as much as we can about each prospect and projecting how they may fit in at our program or what they may or may not be able to do at the next level. That means watching Edouard's highlight tape and being impressed. "****, this guy looks like RG3 out there". Then you do more research and find out that he threw for barely 800 yards on the year while completing less than 50% of his passes. That indicates that while he looked world-class in his highlight tape, there were a lot of other snaps which he was on the field and not looking like that. THat hints at inconsistency. You're telling me we shouldn't judge and dig further based on that? Regardless of his stats, not many can replicate his strengths. That is why he is getting offers from some great programs. But, that doesn't mean I gotta turn a blind eye to his potential weaknesses.
I agree we shouldn't make a totality of an assessment based on that one factor, but you're nuts if you think we should ignore any element of a prospect in analyzing them. I promise you our coaches aren't