TheMatador
All-ACC
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 13,849
I spoke to a UM commit recently and he told me that we will be getting more commits than what we have on Wednesday and these recruits will be what we need. He wouldn’t go any further.
What???? More commits than what we have??? What does that even mean ???
Expect some of our currently uncommitted targets to sign and that we will fill all our needs.
Now, what are our needs? CB? DT? DE?
You figure it out. I think that means we will get 3 DTs. At least. Maybe more. The fourth would have to be Coburn. I feel safe guessing at least the three we know: Chatman, Miller, Silvera. To get Coburn would be icing on the cake.
CB: How many do,we have already? Blades, Frierson, Ivy, Bethel?
I think we need another. Do we need one of the four to play safety? I think so. I hope we get at least one of the AH2. Probably a better shot with Surtain.
There might be somebody else out there we might end up signing. Who, I don't know.
I think we get Ezzard, no problem. Same with Chatman who was one of our earliest targets and obviously was always high on our board. Would love to have Coburn but I'm nervous over this 50-50 business. Something can happen during dead period. I'd feel better if we did not have to fight off UT for a Texas kid.
Be very happy if we can get Coburn and one of the AH CBs. Be happy if we get one of these two options.
Of course, that is in addition to Chatman, Ezzard, Miller and Silvera all being solid.
Chatfield???Not a difference maker in the mold of a Coburn or an AH CB.