- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 21,677
Had to happen in this very different era of "amateur " athletics we are in
yea the head coaches...every one else is working for free and losing money or 2-4k if they are lucky.Coaches still making $8K a year?
No, NIL was not invented for college athletes. The laws simply gives student athletes the same rights as all other American citizens when it comes to profiting off of their name image and likeness. Rights restored. Not the other way around.What still shocks me is that NIL, upon its purest argument, was never meant for any of this, especially HS athletes.
It was designed for enrolled college athletes to be compensated for whenever their name, image, or likeness was used in any monetary capacity, and prohibit the NCAA to deem their amateur status ineligible if they were to commercialize & monetize off their N.I.L.
But, whenever u get politics involved in things that’s not truly in their purview, well u get this.
it evolved at warp speed. aTm helped create the monster "legally " if you will.What still shocks me is that NIL, upon its purest argument, was never meant for any of this, especially HS athletes.
It was designed for enrolled college athletes to be compensated for whenever their name, image, or likeness was used in any monetary capacity, and prohibit the NCAA to deem their amateur status ineligible if they were to commercialize & monetize off their N.I.L.
But, whenever u get politics involved in things that’s not truly in their purview, well u get this.
What still shocks me is that NIL, upon its purest argument, was never meant for any of this, especially HS athletes.
It was designed for enrolled college athletes to be compensated for whenever their name, image, or likeness was used in any monetary capacity, and prohibit the NCAA to deem their amateur status ineligible if they were to commercialize & monetize off their N.I.L.
But, whenever u get politics involved in things that’s not truly in their purview, well u get this.
No, NIL was not invented for college athletes. The laws simply gives student athletes the same rights as all other American citizens when it comes to profiting off of their name image and likeness. Rights restored. Not the other way around.
coaches at schools like IMG make bank tho? just curious, but private vs public correct?yea the head coaches...every one else is working for free and losing money or 2-4k if they are lucky.
the fhsaa is a sham...
ninjas created different random divisions because south florida sweeps the state champ games and we play our state champ games in regular high school level stadiums smh
I see your point which is they should just call it like it is — pay to play. But there is definitely an NIL component involved and now it’s only going to get greater. We had athletic and footwear companies throwing “free” gear at the best athletes back in the 80s. That’s a NIL deal just not direct cash benefit. We’ve had “uncles” handling bags for colleges since then too. Maybe the colleges will have to sponsor kids now? At least this takes it out of the shadows. I am for it.
You should run for the mayor of BeijingLol; no…that wasn’t the argument or the case, friend. Like, not remotely close, actually. Lol.
I don’t have the time nor the patience to meticulously dissect and outline all of this, plus a simple search will take u to these pages. What transpired was the NCAA said F it, we don’t want to be involved or potentially get sued, so they threw together vague language w/ plenty of leeway for loop holes which have been egregiously exploited.
What u just stated is the cause effect of what has transpired, NOT what was brought to the Supreme Court or ruled upon.
You should run for the mayor of Beijing
What still shocks me is that NIL, upon its purest argument, was never meant for any of this, especially HS athletes.
It was designed for enrolled college athletes to be compensated for whenever their name, image, or likeness was used in any monetary capacity, and prohibit the NCAA to deem their amateur status ineligible if they were to commercialize & monetize off their N.I.L.
But, whenever u get politics involved in things that’s not truly in their purview, well u get this.
Are you really angry that HS kids can make money from their name Image and likeness? Is this real? Why are you so triggered? Are you doing like a "devils advocate" skit or something?& u should learn reading comprehension
Are you really angry that HS kids can make money from their name Image and likeness? Is this real? Why are you so triggered? Are you doing like a "devils advocate" skit or something?
Wow someone with a brain that makes sense. High school NIL is beyond stupid. It’s ridiculous. You think tampering is bad in college? This is a joke.What still shocks me is that NIL, upon its purest argument, was never meant for any of this, especially HS athletes.
It was designed for enrolled college athletes to be compensated for whenever their name, image, or likeness was used in any monetary capacity, and prohibit the NCAA to deem their amateur status ineligible if they were to commercialize & monetize off their N.I.L.
But, whenever u get politics involved in things that’s not truly in their purview, well u get this.