- Joined
- Jan 3, 2022
- Messages
- 55
There is for sure research about injury trends following head coaches in soccer. Coach arrives, injuries spike, coach leaves, they drop. No reason to believe the same is not true in football or other sports.Just adding to the above
Before numbers there's no real question as to what context there even is to examine.
1) Is it more severe injuries?
2) More light injuries (however defined) where more guys are getting hurt and it affects their play but not for long periods of time?
What kind on the above? Practice-based? Game-based? Trend on part of the body?
What is the expected number of injuries or type of injuries historically on the team? How far back do we care? In CFB in general? Does any particular pattern hold with moustache in comparison to the rest of CFB at the same point in time?
Also as Alexcane mentioned it seems that Cristobal and not Feld is the actual issue?
This is all really confusing.
Within any data set year to year there is statistical noise, so you're only able to infer the degree to how unusual a spike is.
You have one stress response- it all exerts a toll- practice, games, conditioning, lifting, life stress.
If one hand doesn't know what the other is doing, you can easily break people while every athlete stakeholder thinks he's doing a great job.
The metrics you'd be wanting pay attention to are man-hours lost due to soft tissue injury, frequency, severity and % reinjury rate.
Ultimately if you have someone with no formal knowledge or training (every head coach ever), you're relying on their ability to take advice and listen to stay the course. If the horse won't drink....