- Joined
- Sep 18, 2016
- Messages
- 4,353
Well whats the point of not including it though? like not including it just makes it more complicated plain and simple.
Not really.
Well whats the point of not including it though? like not including it just makes it more complicated plain and simple.
yes really. and Arkansas states own laywers imply that the game was not "impossible" to be played and use teams like FAU as examples the game never should have been canceled. adding in the word Hurricane in there takes literally 3 seconds, and protects us from even needing to argue about it. And trust me MANY people talking about this are on arkansas states side saying we should have played.Not really.
Why on earth we'd (or anyone in the ACC) would sign the contract that gives Earthquake as an example of an "unforeseen catastrophe or disaster" but not a ******* Hurricane is beyone me.
In any scheduling contract we sign, there should be NO DOUBT that we are able to cancel games due to Hurricanes, whether its an away or home game. The fact that there can even be an argument just shows how **** a contract it was for us...and I don't know **** about this kinda stuff.
I just know if you're in Miami it makes a helluva lot of sense to mention a Hurricane as a reason to cancel the game.
yes really. and Arkansas states own laywers imply that the game was not "impossible" to be played and use teams like FAU as examples the game never should have been canceled. adding in the word Hurricane in there takes literally 3 seconds, and protects us from even needing to argue about it. And trust me MANY people talking about this are on arkansas states side saying we should have played.
I don't think the failure to identify a hurricane will significantly impair our defense on whether we were justified in cancelling.
I agree. It is not an exclusive list. I see little problem for us legally on the cancellation issue. I don't care what other schools did. They might have been reckless. Our school was dismissed and our players released for humanitarian reasons to attend to family responsibilities.Look, I know you think you have to be informed about everything, but you have no clue what you’re talking about. I’m a litigator. I argue about contracts for a living. You don’t. Inserting the word “hurricane” in there makes no difference because there’s no argument about whether a hurricane counts as a force majeure event.
I agree but saying, as they did in their letter, that it was not force majeure because the hurricane was not in Arkansas, borders on the outrageous. The fact our players could not leave their homes because of the emergency is just ridiculous. I would hope it offends even the Arkansas judge and/or jury.It makes zero difference. There is no claim by ASU that a Hurricane is not covered by the force majeure clause. What they are claiming is that there was no “force majeure” because it was possible for us to play the game.
I agree but saying, as they did in their letter, that it was not force majeure because the hurricane was not in Arkansas, borders on the outrageous. The fact our players could not leave their homes because of the emergency is just ridiculous. I would hope it offends even the Arkansas judge and/or jury.
As I've said, I think the more difficult issue for us MIGHT be whether we reasonably declined to reschedule before 2024.
This case was filed in state court. It won't be on Pacer.
I doubt that UM has even answered yet. Suit was just filed less than a week ago. So, UM might not have made an appearance yet.
Lmfao!Agree on force majeure though they'll try to say we could've made it up after the ACCCG not that it would be reasonable.
If we have to litigate there we don't want to bring in some hot shot Miami attorney. We're better off with their best Foghorn Leghorn...a guy who eats chicken n dumplings with the judge at the local cafe on Thursdays.
About time
So...should I tell my cousin Vinny to forget about it?Agree on force majeure though they'll try to say we could've made it up after the ACCCG not that it would be reasonable.
If we have to litigate there we don't want to bring in some hot shot Miami attorney. We're better off with their best Foghorn Leghorn...a guy who eats chicken n dumplings with the judge at the local cafe on Thursdays.
It will be removed........
So...should I tell my cousin Vinny to forget about it?
TFW you look up Arkansas State's general counsel and see their educational backgrounds.
View attachment 58386
my claiming not to be a lawyer was not used as any grounds to prove anything. I have an opinion, that's all. And by the same token being a lawyer does not make one's opinion right either. It was **** lawyers who crafted the thing and you have other lawyers disputing its language. So not even lawyers agree which means not all lawyers are right in there opinions either. Which is why I guess we have judges.
It's not Arkansas State's fault that Miami has bad weather from time to time. They shouldn't have to bear the cost.