It's generally -6.5 offshore while Las Vegas is majority -7. Opened as low as -5.
Dangerous game. Miami was rated higher than Illiinois in preseason, but not appreciably. The reference I use had Miami #28 and Illinois #37. That would align with a neutral court spread of Miami -2.
You always hope to draw an upstart stiff in this round, a team that was rated 100th or worse in preseason but managed to spring an upset in the first round. Invariably they can't sustain it, and are flattened. Arizona got to play preseason #133 Harvard today. Best of luck.
At least the Canes didn't have a terrible draw, and face someone in round two who was rated ahead of them in preseason. That's when it really gets dicey. Fans and commentators expect you to be better. As often as not, the opponent looks superior.
So we are a #2 seed. We blew out the 15 seed in our first game. Our second game is a Big Ten team which was the winner of the 7 vs. 10 matchup.
I'm having bad flashbacks to the 1999 Tournament. Hoping things go different this time around.
So we are a #2 seed. We blew out the 15 seed in our first game. Our second game is a Big Ten team which was the winner of the 7 vs. 10 matchup.
I'm having bad flashbacks to the 1999 Tournament. Hoping things go different this time around.
That was the #10 seed. This is the #7 seed. That team was from Indiana. This is one is from Illinois. Nothing alike.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjhPlqcbxwc
Woman asks an insanely stupid question.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly75UtmlF_0
"We've played guards of his (Larkin's) caliber all season long."
No you haven't.
We lost to Purdue in 1999 not Indiana. This should be a tough game but if we keep like we have since the 2nd half vs BC we should win.
We lost to Purdue in 1999 not Indiana. This should be a tough game but if we keep like we have since the 2nd half vs BC we should win.
We lost to Purdue in 1999 not Indiana. This should be a tough game but if we keep like we have since the 2nd half vs BC we should win.
That's the problem, someone started a game thread in 1999 saying we were playing Purdue, while we were really playing Texas.
So we are a #2 seed. We blew out the 15 seed in our first game. Our second game is a Big Ten team which was the winner of the 7 vs. 10 matchup.
I'm having bad flashbacks to the 1999 Tournament. Hoping things go different this time around.
That was the #10 seed. This is the #7 seed. That team was from Indiana. This is one is from Illinois. Nothing alike.
Now I feel better.
We lost to Purdue in 1999 not Indiana. This should be a tough game but if we keep like we have since the 2nd half vs BC we should win.
That's the problem, someone started a game thread in 1999 saying we were playing Purdue, while we were really playing Texas.
Texas was 2008 in round 2
Missouri 2002 round 1
Tulsa 2000 Sweet 16
Purdue was 1999 in round 2
UCLA 1998 round 1
Western Kentucky 1960 round 2