- Joined
- Jun 24, 2014
- Messages
- 3,388
Maybe he doesn't get the whole idea behind the "crystal ball"That’s so dumb. How does he say that and not put in the cb?!! That guy is horrible. Always vague and always sure after kids make decisions. Lol
Maybe he doesn't get the whole idea behind the "crystal ball"That’s so dumb. How does he say that and not put in the cb?!! That guy is horrible. Always vague and always sure after kids make decisions. Lol
Maybe he doesn't get the whole idea behind the "crystal ball"
Has anyone followed his recruitment at all? With us just offering and him committing now I’m guessing it’s not us either. Looks like a SEC LB who is not one of the stud 5 stars but next thing you know he’s a 2 time All SEC player
Im not crapping my pants, I think there is plenty of time and think that UM should continue to evaluate and expand the board at LB. Im just talking about taking a prospect who is average at best this early.Its Early May of 2019 bro
Way to early to start crapping your pants over the LB class... Catch me mid season closer to Early signing day with how things have shaken out
Im not crapping my pants, I think there is plenty of time and think that UM should continue to evaluate and expand the board at LB. Im just talking about taking a prospect who is average at best this early.
Lets say we land Flowe and any other higher rated LB recruit.. making Mathis our 3rd best lb in class
What would you say then? This is realistic even if you sub out Flowe for another 4 star LB nationally
I would consider it a good overall pull, but I still hold my opinion of just adding prospects or keeping prospects commits because we need a certain number of recruits at a certain position for a class. There are LBs that I think are rank the same as Mathis or even lower who I would take before him.Lets say we land Flowe and any other higher rated LB recruit.. making Mathis our 3rd best lb in class
What would you say then? This is realistic even if you sub out Flowe for another 4 star LB nationally
I would consider it a good overall pull, but I still hold my opinion of just adding prospects or keeping prospects commits because we need a certain number of recruits at a certain position for a class. There are LBs that I think are rank the same as Mathis or even lower who I would take before him.
Your right, he just doesn't strike me as a difference maker and if we are trying to get to that elite level we need difference makers regardless of how many stars a player has.Well now your getting into your own PERSONAL opinion on similar level recruits than to the defensive staff... This kid is pretty good (not flowe/samapah level) but a very nice recruit who still hasn't played his senior year and might pick it up even more..
Either way the staff thinks highly enough of him to accept his commitment in the summertime. This is not just a "filler" recruit when you've been missing all year and scrambling to throw names in before NSD
From whats being reported the staff sees kinsler as a lb and id tend to agree based off his size.Mathis, Simpson, Flagg, Washington, and another lb? I know Washington is considered a striker and Miami is recruiting Harrell as a DE as I was told on here. Kinsler a lb too?
Coordinated effort with our graphics team. I hope we see this consistently with remaing players. Very cool.One of the better commitment announcements I've seen. Sounds like a good kid.
Coordinated effort with our graphics team. I hope we see this consistently with remaing players. Very cool.
Forgot about him. Thanks . So flowe mathis Kinsler and then either Simpson,flagg or austin-caveFrom whats being reported the staff sees kinsler as a lb and id tend to agree based off his size.