- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 23,996
You’d lose half the board.
You’d lose half the board.
There is none.
Okay, so what is the connection with ****ey?Incorrect, good sir.
That's a first.Incorrect, good sir.
Okay, so what is the connection with ****ey?
Ah… Roderick “thinks Jurrion’s ****eys” PleasantIt doesn’t matter. Not everything is for public consumption.
Oh **** no. If I was a Maude I’d disable your account for a full day for this one. Have a good day sir.Ah… Roderick “thinks Jurrion’s ****eys” Pleasant
Jk, and wouldn’t care anyway.
He didn’t mention track at all. The dude has BC and Psu in his top schools lol and I doubt they have elite track programs
I kinda get it, Im a speed guy too but they play different positions. If Thad can be a hammer type, that thunder type that you hate to tackle late in games, there is value in that.. I just dont know if he is that type, we will find out..I'd rather bring in a guy like this as opposed to a guy like Thad Franklin. At least he has at least speed he can bring top the field and the track team. Franklin brings nothing... kinda like a guy like Worsham
I wonder what the cost of taking track up to the next level would be? Baylor and Texas Tech are up there so it’s not impossible.
Good question. They're certainly helped by being in Texas like we are being in Florida. Both states produce a ton of sprinters. UF and FSU have both had it going on, but we never have seemed to outside of a couple of women. Yes, the cost of tuition here is expensive, so we'd have to at least start handing out full rides. Beyond that, major upgrades everywhere.
Female track would probably a good place for added scholarships???There might also be some additional costs associated with Title IX compliance. This isn't really in my wheel house, but my understanding is once a school provides financial assistance, Title IX comes into play and there's a certain level of matching required between male and female athletes. So if there is an uptick in men's track & field scholarships offered, I think UM would need to match those scholarships for female athletes (not necessarily in track, but across women's athletics). And if there are enough new male scholarships being offered, that could potentially require a new female athletics program (for example, if UM has maxed out scholarships across the other female sports).
I'm sure there are people on the board with more knowledge on this subject who can chime in, but when it comes to putting more financial assistance and money into certain male sports, my (limited) understanding is that often requires putting more financial assistance and money into female sports.
There might also be some additional costs associated with Title IX compliance. This isn't really in my wheel house, but my understanding is once a school provides financial assistance, Title IX comes into play and there's a certain level of matching required between male and female athletes. So if there is an uptick in men's track & field scholarships offered, I think UM would need to match those scholarships for female athletes (not necessarily in track, but across women's athletics). And if there are enough new male scholarships being offered, that could potentially require a new female athletics program (for example, if UM has maxed out scholarships across the other female sports).
I'm sure there are people on the board with more knowledge on this subject who can chime in, but when it comes to putting more financial assistance and money into certain male sports, my (limited) understanding is that often requires putting more financial assistance and money into female sports.
Female track would probably a good place for added scholarships???
One way to skirt that issue would be NIL deals that pay enough to let them take their partial scholarship and pay whatever extra tuition costs.
Then again, they could get both at other schools, in particular the ones that offer full scholarships and then a NIL deal.
Track and field scholarships can be for either indoor or outdoor.There might also be some additional costs associated with Title IX compliance. This isn't really in my wheel house, but my understanding is once a school provides financial assistance, Title IX comes into play and there's a certain level of matching required between male and female athletes. So if there is an uptick in men's track & field scholarships offered, I think UM would need to match those scholarships for female athletes (not necessarily in track, but across women's athletics). And if there are enough new male scholarships being offered, that could potentially require a new female athletics program (for example, if UM has maxed out scholarships across the other female sports).
I'm sure there are people on the board with more knowledge on this subject who can chime in, but when it comes to putting more financial assistance and money into certain male sports, my (limited) understanding is that often requires putting more financial assistance and money into female sports.
Theres no way Univ of Miami Track team should suck like they do.I really, really hope T&F is able to get in on the current miami financial commitment resurrection. Win/win for multiple sports programs