Wouldn’t it be equally as hard to make & stick in the NFL?
Just to provide context. I was a 100m sprinter in college, 4x All Big 12. Both my coaches were olympians and I have a network of numerous elite profession track athletes both past and present.
I think it’s easier to make the NFL at 6’3 running a 4.3 low then to consistently place top 3 at World Championships/Olympics. I’ve seen countless NCAA champions who never make an Olympic team. Guys that have run 9.9 and under 20 in the 200m. Unless you place top 3 at a championship track deals are awful! One of my friends won 2016 USATF Olympic trials championship. Made the final in Rio but placed outside of the top 3.
For winning the US Trials you win $80k. New Balance offered him $125k Salary for three years plus unlimited gear and help with travel expenses. If you win the Olympics/world championship you win $100k. If you set a record you win an additional $150k. You can compete in the diamond league throughout the summer but the prize money is dependent upon winning. Each diamond league race the winner takes home $10k. The winner of the circuit wins $50k. There are 15 meets all around the world but typically you wouldn’t compete in more than 10 stops. So you’re winnings are usually capped at $150k. Note, that means you’re winning every race though.
This guy is elite and the most he ever made in one year was around $275K but since then he’s been basically making his salary as he’s dealt with injuries. This is best case scenario for a lot of pro track athletes. The other people I know aren’t making more than $40-50k a year. Track earnings are dominated by the top 2-4 people in the world at their respective event. Most run professionally for the love of the sport not the money.
One 4.2 high, 4.3 low at a combine will earn him more money in 1 contract than he would earn throughout an entire track career.