TOcane
All ACC
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2018
- Messages
- 5,039
That's kind of what happened this year with Ishmael vs Payton.First ones to commit plus saving a spot for stewart
That's kind of what happened this year with Ishmael vs Payton.First ones to commit plus saving a spot for stewart
No way! Ishmael’s dad is part of the staff. Payton would never be taken over him.That's kind of what happened this year with Ishmael vs Payton.
I was kind of getting at the fact that they are the same player but one committed first.No way! Ishmael’s dad is part of the staff. Payton would never be taken over him.
Hope we don't fall back into the over-recruit under-recruit oscillating cycle we've been in the past 20 years. Taking 4 DEs in a year is just a recipe for roster headache in most instances. Someone transfers out because they're behind, the next year's class is weak because 'logjam', and you're back in a bind in 2 years. 3 DEs should be fine in a big year if we recruit well. 2 is minimum anyhow. There's always a kid who looks like a 'could grow into a DT' who you can think about at that spot. 5-6 DL / year and 4 OL (9-10 total) is the right number.With the amount of d-ends available for 2022 is it possible we can get 3 or 4?
Hopefully having DEs drafted high helps with next years batch but everyone will be coming after them too.Yesterday Kenyata Jackson got a cb to OSU and he was considered a cane lean by most.Hopefully we can get 2 or 3 good one but they will be uphill battles against all the bag schools.Hope we don't fall back into the over-recruit under-recruit oscillating cycle we've been in the past 20 years. Taking 4 DEs in a year is just a recipe for roster headache in most instances. Someone transfers out because they're behind, the next year's class is weak because 'logjam', and you're back in a bind in 2 years. 3 DEs should be fine in a big year if we recruit well. 2 is minimum anyhow. There's always a kid who looks like a 'could grow into a DT' who you can think about at that spot. 5-6 DL / year and 4 OL (9-10 total) is the right number.
If we do our job right it shouldn't be an uphill battle everywhere. Staying home, playing for the hometown team, getting to NFL (our DEs do that well), it's an attractive situation. If we can't offer anything remotely competitive, that's the fault of our boosters. I get it bags for some top 5* kids but I don't see OSU or Alabama needing to go to So Fla for DL. CBs, sure.Hopefully having DEs drafted high helps with next years batch but everyone will be coming after them too.Yesterday Kenyata Jackson got a cb to OSU and he was considered a cane lean by most.Hopefully we can get 2 or 3 good one but they will be uphill battles against all the bag schools.
Shemar is different bro...If we do our job right it shouldn't be an uphill battle everywhere. Staying home, playing for the hometown team, getting to NFL (our DEs do that well), it's an attractive situation. If we can't offer anything remotely competitive, that's the fault of our boosters. I get it bags for some top 5* kids but I don't see OSU or Alabama needing to go to So Fla for DL. CBs, sure.
welp i guess i won't follow this kids recruitment hahahha.Shemar is different bro...
He’s gonna get Cam Newton type money offers & you can never underestimate what other programs do when it comes to recruiting our local Elite players, it’s never about need, they rarely ever need to get players from South FL, they just do it because they can as a means to establish their dominance on the trail.
Landing a kid like Shemar would be even bigger & harder than landing Leonard Taylor, trust me when I tell you, if we get him it’ll be nothing short of a miracle from Heaven if he turned down the astronomical bags that LSU, Bama, Oh ST, Clemson, UF & UGA will offer.
I hear you re stewart but the comment I responded to was re Kenyata jackson.Shemar is different bro...
He’s gonna get Cam Newton type money offers & you can never underestimate what other programs do when it comes to recruiting our local Elite players, it’s never about need, they rarely ever need to get players from South FL, they just do it because they can as a means to establish their dominance on the trail.
Landing a kid like Shemar would be even bigger & harder than landing Leonard Taylor, trust me when I tell you, if we get him it’ll be nothing short of a miracle from Heaven if he turned down the astronomical bags that LSU, Bama, Oh ST, Clemson, UF & UGA will offer.
Oh my fault I didn’t read the previous comment lol.I hear you re stewart but the comment I responded to was re Kenyata jackson.
And this is why miami has to take a chance on a local 5* like Lewis and hope for the best because we lose way,way more of these battles than we win.It's extremely early but it seems we're trailing for Stewart and K.Jackson,top 2 local DEs.Dante Anderson seems like a more realistic target,he's a smaller DE than the other 2.Shemar is different bro...
He’s gonna get Cam Newton type money offers & you can never underestimate what other programs do when it comes to recruiting our local Elite players, it’s never about need, they rarely ever need to get players from South FL, they just do it because they can as a means to establish their dominance on the trail.
Landing a kid like Shemar would be even bigger & harder than landing Leonard Taylor, trust me when I tell you, if we get him it’ll be nothing short of a miracle from Heaven if he turned down the astronomical bags that LSU, Bama, Oh ST, Clemson, UF & UGA will offer.
We need to win. We need to evaluate better. We need to be competitive ('in the game') for top kids. If we can't figure out how to do that, we're going to be relegated to fluffer.And this is why miami has to take a chance on a local 5* like Lewis and hope for the best because we lose way,way more of these battles than we win.It's extremely early but it seems we're trailing for Stewart and K.Jackson,top 2 local DEs.Dante Anderson seems like a more realistic target,he's a smaller DE than the other 2.
Hope we don't fall back into the over-recruit under-recruit oscillating cycle we've been in the past 20 years. Taking 4 DEs in a year is just a recipe for roster headache in most instances. Someone transfers out because they're behind, the next year's class is weak because 'logjam', and you're back in a bind in 2 years. 3 DEs should be fine in a big year if we recruit well. 2 is minimum anyhow. There's always a kid who looks like a 'could grow into a DT' who you can think about at that spot. 5-6 DL / year and 4 OL (9-10 total) is the right number.
We’re actually in a good spot for Kenyatta Jackson, the early CB to Oh St is premature, with the way Oh St is recruiting for the 22 class there’s a good chance he might not even be a take for them in the long run.And this is why miami has to take a chance on a local 5* like Lewis and hope for the best because we lose way,way more of these battles than we win.It's extremely early but it seems we're trailing for Stewart and K.Jackson,top 2 local DEs.Dante Anderson seems like a more realistic target,he's a smaller DE than the other 2.
Nah bruh, tell us how you really feel. LolOh my fault I didn’t read the previous comment lol.
I'm fine with 3. 4 seems like too many and will cost us at DE and elsewhere.I mentioned 3-4 or because usually one or two of them aren't physically ready and needs a redshirt.
Do you watch football from other conferences??I'm fine with 3. 4 seems like too many and will cost us at DE and elsewhere.
If we're expecting significant true frosh contributions from any DEs, we're in a world of hurt. That happens rarely.
Assuming we need to leave an IC open each year for a transfer at a need spot, we can only take 24 kids a cycle.
Your 24 kids needs to spread around. You need a QB, 1-2 RBs, a TE, a few WRs, 4 OL, a K every other year. That's 11-12 kids on O. So I have 12-13 defensive spots. Gotta have 5 DBs in this day and age, and 2-3 LBs, so you have 5 DL spots, give or take. That breaks down into 3 DEs and 2 DTs regularly. If you take a 6th DL, it's more effectively used for another DT, IMO. No need to take more than 3 DEs because the 4th kid won't be the one who gives you early minutes and you'll just be setting your roster up for a log-jam, transfer(s) and a bad recruiting year next cycle (because kids see the logjam).
We've seen this team over-recruits spots and it rarely works. We need 3 DEs next year, and we just have to pick well, IMO.
What does that even mean? There's nothing new about 25 ICs or 85 roster numbers. The portal isn't this new big deal people make it out to be. It's just a centralized way to transfer. Teams have been playing underclassmen for ages and will continue to. Not because of the portal. Because some kids are good enough and all else being near equal it's a good way to market your program.Do you watch football from other conferences??
All teams worth a lick HAVE to mix in underclassmen because of the portal
Is it a talent thing or is there more to it? Cuz LT seems like a truly elite physical talent, but he did make it known that he wasn’t leaving the state early which may have made the bag schools figure it wasn’t worth it.Shemar is different bro...
He’s gonna get Cam Newton type money offers & you can never underestimate what other programs do when it comes to recruiting our local Elite players, it’s never about need, they rarely ever need to get players from South FL, they just do it because they can as a means to establish their dominance on the trail.
Landing a kid like Shemar would be even bigger & harder than landing Leonard Taylor, trust me when I tell you, if we get him it’ll be nothing short of a miracle from Heaven if he turned down the astronomical bags that LSU, Bama, Oh ST, Clemson, UF & UGA will offer.