jkaz1
Senior
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2012
- Messages
- 4,667
I definitely agree with only taking the shorter CBs who really bring something to the table - like Young (did) and especially Bandy.
Two of the shorter CBs during the Butch era were Duane Starks (5'10") and Philip Buchanon (5'9").
But they were both burners and both left as first-rounders.
And Buchanon was one of the most dangerous Canes with the ball in his hands - either after an INT or on punt returns - slippery and explosive.
And Starks housed one during the 1st Ravens Super Bowl if I remember correctly.
If Davis is that good, then grab him. If not, then let's get ones who are taller with the same or better skill set.
Two of the shorter CBs during the Butch era were Duane Starks (5'10") and Philip Buchanon (5'9").
But they were both burners and both left as first-rounders.
And Buchanon was one of the most dangerous Canes with the ball in his hands - either after an INT or on punt returns - slippery and explosive.
And Starks housed one during the 1st Ravens Super Bowl if I remember correctly.
If Davis is that good, then grab him. If not, then let's get ones who are taller with the same or better skill set.
I've heard the same thing as @Brooklyndee -- there was some politics involved in Davis starting over Blades.
Davis is a good player who can play here, but I have no problem with setting high physical standards at DB. This isn't like Shannon or Golden era where the cupboard is bare. Ideally, a 5'10 corner should be a special athlete with 4.4 speed and playmaking ability with the ball in his hands.