If we're only taking 1 LB this class, I would prefer it be Louis than Joyner.
I like Joyner & think he's a good prospect with upside, but Louis is the quintessential Miami Mike LB.
After Shaq goes to the draft, we're going to need an A-1 successor, and while I think Steed will be an All conference player, I think he's more of a Will LB in our scheme. Even though, he can play all 3 LB spots.
Jennings is probably going to be a Mike for us, but I think ultimately he'll be best at Sam backer.
If we're only taking 1 LB this class, I would prefer it be Louis than Joyner.
I like Joyner & think he's a good prospect with upside, but Louis is the quintessential Miami Mike LB.
After Shaq goes to the draft, we're going to need an A-1 successor, and while I think Steed will be an All conference player, I think he's more of a Will LB in our scheme. Even though, he can play all 3 LB spots.
Jennings is probably going to be a Mike for us, but I think ultimately he'll be best at Sam backer.
If we're only taking 1 LB this class, I would prefer it be Louis than Joyner.
I like Joyner & think he's a good prospect with upside, but Louis is the quintessential Miami Mike LB.
After Shaq goes to the draft, we're going to need an A-1 successor, and while I think Steed will be an All conference player, I think he's more of a Will LB in our scheme. Even though, he can play all 3 LB spots.
Jennings is probably going to be a Mike for us, but I think ultimately he'll be best at Sam backer.
No question, that's where Grace would have shined last season under Diaz.If we're only taking 1 LB this class, I would prefer it be Louis than Joyner.
I like Joyner & think he's a good prospect with upside, but Louis is the quintessential Miami Mike LB.
After Shaq goes to the draft, we're going to need an A-1 successor, and while I think Steed will be an All conference player, I think he's more of a Will LB in our scheme. Even though, he can play all 3 LB spots.
Jennings is probably going to be a Mike for us, but I think ultimately he'll be best at Sam backer.
I agree with all of this.
The key in Diaz' system, is that while it's nice to have the "natural Mike," it's also good to have kids who can be flexible when you're in nickel or dime, or playing the Buck backer which you see more against spread teams