forums

2014 SOS based on 2013 records (Miami #14)

canes1977 said:
Louisville on the road with a Freshman QB who has never thrown a college pass and you dont see how this would be that difficult of a game. We just got murdered by them a few months ago on a neutral field. While Teddy played well, he wasnt the only reason we lost.
Click to expand...

Their defense **** on us pretty bad. Thank god they lost a ton of talent from that team and have to implement a new defense at the same time.
 
Advertisement
Consigliere said:
motorcitycane said:
If the Gunner Kielh kid is legit then Cincy could be a very tough game
Click to expand...

Honestly, if he was legit he would have stayed at ND IMO. He hasn't even been named the starter yet, there is another guy recovering who missed 2013.
Click to expand...

May be a little early make a judgment on him either way. Gunner transferred as a freshman probably because he realized that beating out the QB (Golson) that took the team to the NC game, wasn't going to happen.....In one half, he passed for 300 yards in Cincinnati's spring game last week.
 
Last edited:
canes1977 said:
SevenNSeven said:
Louisville: New QB, New Coaching Staff

FAMU: is FAMU

Arkansas State: New QB, New Coaching Staff

Nebraska: New QB

Georgia Tech: New QB

Virginia Tech: New QB

Virginia: New QB

Pitt: New QB


FSU, Duke, UNC, Cincinnati: play at home with our 'home field advantage'...****, forget that last part.


Of course, we, obviously will be starting a new QB as well, but there are no excuses on why we shouldn't win 10 games. None.
Click to expand...

That's a solid season with a Freshman QB and will set us up nicely for the following year when we can compete with a Winston-less FSU for the Conference and hopefully a spot in the 4 team playoff.
Click to expand...

Yep, they will lose a ton of talented seniors on offense:

WR-Greene
TE- Oleary
RB- Williams
OL- All projected starters are SRs
RsSo- Winston

No projected SRs on defense but a few JRs may declare. At least the experienced talent gap will be closed as far as our D vs their O....Coaching is a different story, though.
 
Advertisement
"We should beat these teams because they'll be starting new QBs, no excuses for us even though we're starting a new QB, which is the reason I gave for why those teams are so beatable." Only this board can provide that sound logic.
 
Consigliere said:
motorcitycane said:
If the Gunner Kielh kid is legit then Cincy could be a very tough game
Click to expand...

Honwestly, if he was legit he would have stayed at ND IMO. He hasn't even been named the starter yet, there is another guy recovering who missed 2013.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily since they seem to be set there and he wasn't top two at the time.

He was originally slated to go to IU then decided between Bama and ND. I may be mistaken, but I think he even gave Bama a verbal for second. Either way, great name for a QB, but he seems to question or even seem wishy washy at times. Not exactly what I'd say is ideal in a QB.
 
SevenNSeven said:
Louisville: New QB, New Coaching Staff

FAMU: is FAMU

Arkansas State: New QB, New Coaching Staff

Nebraska: New QB

Georgia Tech: New QB

Virginia Tech: New QB

Virginia: New QB

Pitt: New QB


FSU, Duke, UNC, Cincinnati: play at home with our 'home field advantage'...****, forget that last part.


Of course, we, obviously will be starting a new QB as well, but there are no excuses on why we shouldn't win 10 games. None.
Click to expand...
Wait... wut?
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top