I don't see how Hester changes anything this year. Thomas, Wyche and Moten should help immediately.
at the spring game it seems like 93 was helping things in a big way. looking forward to having those three in the mix
I don't see how Hester changes anything this year. Thomas, Wyche and Moten should help immediately.
I think it is unreasonable to expect a bigger jump than from 2012 to 2013 based on the talent shuffle on defense. The safety position obviously has more raw talent, but there are people talking about depending on a DT that isn't even on campus yet.
I also think it is unreasonable to expect the offense to be significantly better with olsen and the O-line losses than morris until we see otherwise (and we haven't yet). At best we will improve about 30 spots and be in the mid 50's if duke stays healthy enough to move the chains for the whole year. Hopefully I am wrong.
I think it is unreasonable to expect a bigger jump than from 2012 to 2013 based on the talent shuffle on defense. The safety position obviously has more raw talent, but there are people talking about depending on a DT that isn't even on campus yet.
I also think it is unreasonable to expect the offense to be significantly better with olsen and the O-line losses than morris until we see otherwise (and we haven't yet). At best we will improve about 30 spots and be in the mid 50's if duke stays healthy enough to move the chains for the whole year. Hopefully I am wrong.
I see this point being put out there, and I'm not saying you are totally off base, but really can we be much worse? I personally just feel we can get equal production up front at least, just by default.
Couple that with improvements across the board at DE/Edge Rush, linebacker, and secondary and I think a solid improvement overall is logical. Not saying this will be some top 10 indestructible defense, but I expect improvement regardless who our DC is.
The QB thing is an important point. I really thought with Williams we would see a better ball control offense. Not so many 30 second drives (good and bad) which were both hard on an already weak defense. Now with Olsen in there, that factor seems to be in the air. I thought Williams would be a low turnover, better 3rd down guy, with a little less of the big play effect. Olsen is a complete unknown for me, but he will have a solid backfield and maybe the deepest WR and TE receiving group we have had in....well a long *** time.
I think it is unreasonable to expect a bigger jump than from 2012 to 2013 based on the talent shuffle on defense. The safety position obviously has more raw talent, but there are people talking about depending on a DT that isn't even on campus yet.
I also think it is unreasonable to expect the offense to be significantly better with olsen and the O-line losses than morris until we see otherwise (and we haven't yet). At best we will improve about 30 spots and be in the mid 50's if duke stays healthy enough to move the chains for the whole year. Hopefully I am wrong.
I see this point being put out there, and I'm not saying you are totally off base, but really can we be much worse? I personally just feel we can get equal production up front at least, just by default.
Couple that with improvements across the board at DE/Edge Rush, linebacker, and secondary and I think a solid improvement overall is logical. Not saying this will be some top 10 indestructible defense, but I expect improvement regardless who our DC is.
The QB thing is an important point. I really thought with Williams we would see a better ball control offense. Not so many 30 second drives (good and bad) which were both hard on an already weak defense. Now with Olsen in there, that factor seems to be in the air. I thought Williams would be a low turnover, better 3rd down guy, with a little less of the big play effect. Olsen is a complete unknown for me, but he will have a solid backfield and maybe the deepest WR and TE receiving group we have had in....well a long *** time.
For reference:
Teams that ranked top 50 in total defense: Buffalo, Penn State, Ohio State, Pittsburgh, Syracuse, Marshall, Wake Forest and Oregon.
Teams that ranked top 30 in total defense: Georgia Tech, Baylor, Vanderbilt, Mississippi State, USC, Florida
In those groupings of teams are programs that had real scholarship reductions in PSU and USC. There are also up-tempo teams that give the ball back to their opponents faster than we did in Oregon and Baylor. There are also teams who undoubtedly had less talent than their opponents in Syracuse, Vanderbilt and Mississippi State. And there's Florida whose offense was much worse than ours in executing.
And where did we fall last season? 89th. That's pathetic. There are no excuses for our defense to be that bad. None.
There are absolutely no excuses why we shouldn't have at worst a top 30 defense--other than our coaches being terrible at their jobs. For more reference, the 50th ranked D gave up 383 ypg. The 30th ranked D gave up 364 ypg. We gave up 426 ypg.
I went back to 1999 and Miami's worst ranked defense before Golden was 34th in 2000. Golden's best ranked D since he's ,been here was the 2011 defense that was ranked 45th.
Again, there is no ****ing reason in his 4th year at Miami we shouldn't have at worst a 30th ranked defense. And that's lowering the ball to mid-major expectations.
The main thing I get from this post, the guy that mentored our coaches and was a sort of godfather of our defense, was fired from gt because he couldn't get the kids to execute that defense on the field. They hire another guy and get immediate results. Top 30 in year one. Sigh
Yards don't matter. You think he's worried about some inches?Football is a game of inches.
Until our DC acknowledges that, and our D starts to fight for every inch, talent won't matter.
On the contrary to what most people think, I believe the Canes defense will be very much improved this year, and Once the likes of Chad Thomas, Moten and Kiy Hester arrive to provide some extra depth, it should start clicking. What's your opinion on where this defense ends up ranked?
I believe overall D will be ranked in the top 30.
With the Pass Defense ranked In the top 25.
Not sure if seriousIf Wyche comes in and starts this is a top 10 defense. Else top 30.
He's a troll.......
I think Einstein had a theory on our defense. Something about trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...
I think Einstein had a theory on our defense. Something about trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...
Sure, in year 4 he started seeing better results.I think Einstein had a theory on our defense. Something about trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...
It worked for Narduzzi.
I think Einstein had a theory on our defense. Something about trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...
I think Einstein had a theory on our defense. Something about trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...
this is wrong, we try things over and over again and expect different results. i.e practice, repeating the same things until you learn or get better.
it is repeating the same mistake and thinking this time it will be different. that's the rub