- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 41,496
What’s going on with Cam Williams anyway?
He might get some burn on st’s this year , he needs another year of weight and strength imo before stepping into the dl rotation.
Last edited:
What’s going on with Cam Williams anyway?
Stubbs is trash man. Just because you played at a decent level (Purdue) doesn't mean you can coach other kids to their potential. Nope I was one of the first ones saying get him the **** outta here. He sounded like a cornball.Have you seen PSU's class? They don't have any WR's committed & if you go on their board their fans are ****ed at Stubbsy lack of recruiting too.
Don't mistake Franklin for some Superstar Coach finding guru, he hired Stubbs because he thought he would be another guy who could help recruit down in FL with Seider, but he found out the hard way just like we did that Stubbs is trash.
I'm not interested in having this discussion all over again as I had last year with several people on this board & was proven to be right. Stubbs can't recruit, this is a fact, it's not up for debate, just look at his track record.
And I guarantee you he gets fired from Penn St next year, take that to the bank.
I dont agree with this at all....unless you are really elite even Clemson has lost to a bad Syracuse team or really close games to lesser teams....Alabama and Saban had a bad lost to S. Carolina that doesnt mean they have guys who are not motivated that just happens when youre dealing with 18 and 19 year olds...of course as a leader you want to bring out the best in your players every week but it does happen from time to time
If u been on recently u know that I'm finally excited about recruiting......I just want us to sneak into that next tier and I'm hoping that's this cycle or the following. I'm greedy I want everyoneWe’re literally about to land the number 1 DT in the country, #4 player overall. I don’t think Stewart is a Clowney type. Clowney is a pure freak.
Facts I was with u bruh the minute he spoke I knew he couldn't recruit lol. Couldn't believe people defended him here then those defenders were on board the minute he left.Stubbs is trash man. Just because you played at a decent level (Purdue) doesn't mean you can coach other kids to their potential. Nope I was one of the first ones saying get him the **** outta here. He sounded like a cornball.
I was clearly joking.We, literally, cannot do this.
Um...yes we can starting in 2021
I was clearly joking.
My bad, i was just thinking that in FL that players can get marketing deal and you can pitch it (not a specific business).No. We. Can't.
You are wrong. 100% wrong. The school cannot, at all, "set up deals".
You're just wrong. You act like I've never heard of NIL.
Have you seen PSU's class? They don't have any WR's committed & if you go on their board their fans are ****ed at Stubbsy lack of recruiting too.
Don't mistake Franklin for some Superstar Coach finding guru, he hired Stubbs because he thought he would be another guy who could help recruit down in FL with Seider, but he found out the hard way just like we did that Stubbs is trash.
I'm not interested in having this discussion all over again as I had last year with several people on this board & was proven to be right. Stubbs can't recruit, this is fact, it's not up for debate, just look at his track record.
And I guarantee you he gets fired from Penn St next year, take that to the bank.
My bad, i was just thinking that in FL that players can get marketing deal and you can pitch it (not a specific business).
Even a broke clock is right twice a day! Our kids were out of it by the time we played those two teams enos had broken there spirit by then. But thanks f4 pointing out those two losses.FIU, LA tech disagree
If you are significantly more talented then a Team then you should be able to line up kick there *** at the line of scrimmage and run it down there throat. Against LA Tech that wasn't even close to happening, they kicked our *** at the line of scrimmage and easily jammed our WRs at the line. LA tech was the far more physical team. So yes please tell me how there is this vast difference in talent? I would understand if it was just one game but all season long we had these so called less talented teams out play us physical and give our WRs and CBs fits. So no I don't think there is a big difference in talent.You drunk if you think LA TECHS talent was very close to ours!!! We are top 15 in blue chip ratio! What you should have said is they had better coaching and they were more motivated than our guys. Their playbook matches the talent and skills of their guys. You need elite talent AND Xs and Os to be elite. Look at OU and OSU.., They both have top level talent but lose to a less talented team each year, that is coached better. Top 15 blue chip ratio we have is not elite, but it is great talent! Our coaching has been subpar at best for the like 20 something years. We need to pony up and pay for better coaching. Scared money don’t make money!
Hey mackmiller974, your post works both ways! Tru we should've bent la tech over.(didn't we get baker came from la tech? so they kinda know him like he should kinda know them!)?...but once a less talented team see/know f4 sure a more talented team is/have checked out of a game. Plus, Said talent advantage evens up da dynamics, couple that with not knowing the offense, slows our offense down even more. plus, the qb we had,.....can you see where im going with this mack! We had the perfect **** storm/recipe f4 la tech+fiu to happen throw duke in there uf, ga tech, unc,think about that 6-7 could be...?If you are significantly more talented then a Team then you should be able to line up kick there *** at the line of scrimmage and run it down there throat. Against LA Tech that wasn't even close to happening, they kicked our *** at the line of scrimmage and easily jammed our WRs at the line. LA tech was the far more physical team. So yes please tell me how there is this vast difference in talent? I would understand if it was just one game but all season long we had these so called less talented teams out play us physical and give our WRs and CBs fits. So no I don't think there is a big difference in talent.
I think we were a physically weak team who tried to run a physical style of offense and we bent over when other teams punched us in the Mouth and have for several years but that's just me.Hey mackmiller974, your post works both ways! Tru we should've bent la tech over.(didn't we get baker came from la tech? so they kinda know him like he should kinda know them!)?...but once a less talented team see/know f4 sure a more talented team is/have checked out of a game. Plus, Said talent advantage evens up da dynamics, couple that with not knowing the offense, slows our offense down even more. plus, the qb we had,.....can you see where im going with this mack! We had the perfect **** storm/recipe f4 la tech+fiu to happen throw duke in there uf, ga tech, unc,think about that 6-7 could be...?
Agree, were shedding mass f4 speed and athleticism that's the old school cane way. But in my opinion it takes two full cycles of being in the same s&c system f4 your body to get use to it. This is the 2nd cycle of being with feeley.!I think we were a physically weak team who tried to run a physical style of offense and we bent over when other teams punched us in the Mouth and have for several years but that's just me.
If you are significantly more talented then a Team then you should be able to line up kick there *** at the line of scrimmage and run it down there throat. Against LA Tech that wasn't even close to happening, they kicked our *** at the line of scrimmage and easily jammed our WRs at the line. LA tech was the far more physical team. So yes please tell me how there is this vast difference in talent? I would understand if it was just one game but all season long we had these so called less talented teams out play us physical and give our WRs and CBs fits. So no I don't think there is a big difference in talent.
Maybe you didn’t read the end of my post.. I said the teams that lose a bad one each year not a bad one once every 3-5 years. And they are 18-22 year olds, not 18-19. But even then, at every level in every form of competition, not just football, there’s teams that just kill every other team. It’s not just because they’re better, they are more often well coached and do not make mistakes. Coaches that win repeatedly condition their athletes to be mentally prepared. Age is not a factor because bad losses happen at every level. But the ones that take them the least have a routine/standard the coaches set. We lost ours with Coker and never got it back.
Clemson and Alabama win cause they have better players which yes those coaches are getting/recruiting... I’m on the side of players matter more than coaching...do you think Golden state was better coached than every team or was it the fact the had KD, Steph and so on. Coker won cause of the players that guy didn’t know what he was doing. Coaching is important but imo the players matter wayyy more. Dabo was nothing before he started getting the players