- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 45,858
Unless he transitions the way New England has tried to, you are the same people who will ***** when we can't win big games because tough defenses keep us from converting red zone opportunities. It's nice to have great stats and fly the ball up and down the field between the 20s. That's going to get Andy Reid fired this year. That has led Scott Linehan's Lions to a 4-7 record despite extremely good talent.
No one is saying he isn't a talented play designer. Most people are saying he needs to evolve and focus so that his style is as effective in the tough games.
No one is going to question that the names on there have a common denominator? Just how many crucial games have been won overall?
Funny that someone like Al Borges is on there, as this is a description of him:
"Al Borges has spent the vast majority of this year running an offense that was never sure of what it was or what it had." http://www.freep.com/article/201211...rdinator-Al-Borges-dropped-ball-vs-Ohio-State
The bottom line is that Fisch is talented. Fisch needs to evolve because it's fun to put 52 points on Duke, but most of us prefer to see 31 points and effectiveness inside the 20 against FSU.
If we're going to have a discussion about this, please don't reduce this to a "you people think Fisch sucks" vs "Fisch is amazing" thread.
Stopped reading right here. 100% accurate.
I will say this though, I think it was obvious from the get-go that the plan was to score as many points as humanly possible on offense. Ebb and flow of the game be damned we knew we were going to have a horrible defense.
I'm confident we see Fisch evolve.