Mario Cristobal: "If you can't identify and recruit, your value to a program is very little."

DMoney
DMoney
7 min read

Comments (53)

Lot of people in every aspect of life get a job and get happy/lazy/complacent. It’s not unheard of in any industry. The manager at McDonalds was grinding when he was the shift leader. Now all of a sudden he’s the manager and he doesn’t leave the back office.
I have 8 people who work for me. It’s maddening how much a guy will grind for a better position or more pay and the second he gets it hits the cruise control button.
 
Just like in recruiting, no one gets hires 100%. In my experience, the best get 30% of their hires as top quality, 40% as acceptable level and still miss on 30%. There may be more transparency in football vs other industries because you can see part of the job description expectations on the field. But there are so many intangibles it's really really hard to get it right. Also, remember that if you have a lemon like Gattass, the previous organization is willing to lie to you to get him out of their group. That happens a lot.

My point is, when rebuilding an entire operation like Mario is doing, even the greatest organizational leaders ever have to fail forward sometimes.

I'm hoping that there won't be alot of turnover this year as we are going into year 4 and hes had to replace both Coordinators plus every position group outside of Big Joe and Mirabel. He needs stability this year more than ever without a generational offense next year
 
Is Guidry considered a good recruiter? I gotta think his job is on the line the week.
 
Advertisement
Talk about being oversimplistic. There's a little more to it than "they average or they great".
ok sure, but thats the point to people saying you need great players to win double digits. with average players you dont. SMU doesnt have elite players by any means and the kids they took from us were considered average to below average. theyve won 10 games in their first season in the ACC (took us 20 years or so to do it now twice (our schedule is easy too so dont bring up schedule) and they won 11 last year
 
ok sure, but thats the point to people saying you need great players to win double digits. with average players you dont. SMU doesnt have elite players by any means and the kids they took from us were considered average to below average. theyve won 10 games in their first season in the ACC (took us 20 years or so to do it now twice (our schedule is easy too so dont bring up schedule) and they won 11 last year
1. You people have to stop acting as though SMU’s entire two-deep came from our roster. They have a handful of former Miami players and a hundred guys who weren’t.
2. They have put together a very good roster that has been able to have success against…..
3. A very favorable schedule.

The narrative being forced is “why couldn’t Mario win win those same guys??” when it’s not the “same guys”.
 
Advertisement
20+ years of nothing and people still don't get this. It was always about upgrading the roster, not about "outscheming" people.
Ehhhhh, our rosters were usually more loaded than our competition and we didn’t win ****. Sure we were never on a top 5 or top 10 level but relative to our schedule we were more talented than most of the teams we played and lost to. This was evident by our recruiting rankings and the players drafted in comparison to our opponents.

People always want to make things reductive and easy. It’s one of the other. Nah, to win you need good coaching and the jimmies and joes. We can go back and forth on what is more important, sure but both are needed.
 
hows our defense doing with supposedly better players?
Statically our defenses are the same. As far as defensive players that left only one I’d keep for is Robert’s for versatility.

Barrow blows jhh out. Pass rushes and is great against the run. Jhh was a pass rushing 3 tech that stat padded in a manny defense.

I’m still taking Alston/baron over harvey. Harvey looks like the same player he was 5 years here. His best year 2022 Miami 5.5 sacks 2024 smu 5.5 sacks.
 
I have 8 people who work for me. It’s maddening how much a guy will grind for a better position or more pay and the second he gets it hits the cruise control button.
Humans seek the four As, attention, affection, approval and acceptance, usually from an external source. When they don't have it, they'll do everything they can to achieve it, once they got it, they'll shut down until they don't have it anymore.
 
Advertisement
The point was they were cast-off and now some of them have been coached up

Feels like a stretch to me. Even if I add in Harvey to the impact player group, that's a 50% hit rate. CISers think it's Armageddon if Mario hits on only 50% of our guys. And who would you bench over any of these guys? Are Roberts and Harvey better than Bain or Mesidor? JHH better than Barrow?

The big one is Brashard. I loved that kid's talent as did 99% on the board. He certainly wasn't coached up, we all saw how disruptive he was last year. But he was inconsistent, too. Would you put him in over X at slot? Now that he's made the move to RB successfully, which BTW is where I wanted to play him, I can see the argument vs Martinez and Fletcher. But do we really want him in blocking Cam Ward? Would still have loved to have found a way to keep him. But he was not going to be a full-time starter here. He compliments SMU's offense much better than he does Miami's. So that's a win/win, IMO.
 
Back
Top