CB Xavier Lucas is transferring to Miami

DMoney
DMoney
2 min read

Comments (589)

ACC defending us would make it look like UM is in the wrong. No need to rebuttal **** allegations, gives rumors legs.

Kid wanted to go home, Wisky said no. Kid un-enrolled and then enrolled at the college close to home because he’s a free ******* man.
They can accuse Wisconsin of tampering with dyoni hill and TVD if the early contacts occurred.
 
This is not about "Wisconsin" having power in the Big 10.

There is a very specific reason why "the Big 10" is announcing that they are "standing behind Wisconsin".

It's because the Big 10 drafted the bull**** 2-year Grant of Rights that Xavier Lucas signed.

They will never admit that the "contract" was a pile of horse****.
You’re absolutely killing it in here.

rc9abbQM.gif
 
Feudal/sharecropping mentality rearing its ugly head. I may have an associate figure out which BIG state has the broadest public records law and complete a record request for a copy of this "contract".
Some states require requesters to be residents I believe.
 
Just published:



The document shown to Sportico was from another Big Ten institution, and was provided by a source under an agreement that the specific school not be publicized. The MOU does not include language that would prohibit an athlete from transferring after signing


Lmao
 
Advertisement
I really can't emphasize enough how much I agree with you on how this went down. Non-competes are for executives and directors not teenagers.
And even then if they’re not very limited, courts hate them and toss them.
 
Lmao at having to repay rev-share money to even enter your name in the portal. Miami/ACC should go on PR blitz, say they're for the players/won't do lockupa for more than 1 year/etc
 
am I right in assuming this has got to be one of the worst violations to come to light publicly in a long time?

I mean they supposedly didn't pay Lucas technically through UW athletics (they funneled through the outside collective).. But there's enough collaboration there for NCAA (or whoever) to find pay-for-play being instituted at the conference level
 
Last edited:
Nice to see Miami isn’t standing by itself and getting hammered by Wisconsin and Big Ten. Instead, many of the top attorneys and law school professors in the field are laying waste to Wisconsin’s actions and flimsy NIL contract. Very encouraging if you understand the influence of those siding with Xavier and Canes.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Question for the CIS lawyers: Since Wisconsin and the Big Ten don't want the template out, and assuming Lucas has a copy, is there anything legally stopping Lucas and Heitner from publishing it on Twitter?
 
Question for the CIS lawyers: Since Wisconsin and the Big Ten don't want the template out, and assuming Lucas has a copy, is there anything legally stopping Lucas and Heitner from publishing it on Twitter?
Depends on whether there's a NDA included.

The fact that they don't want the template out however indicates foul play. The template is being roasted as we speak.
 
It's ******* illegal.

Essentially the meat and potatoes of this, is that UW would own his NIL, give him a share (figure provided in the contract) but they’re able to sell those rights to a third party and the player doesn’t see any of that money? Am I reading that right? Also at their discretion, they can raise or lower the original amount (somehow the player is not an employee)? What a round about way of saying it’s performance based…

Sounds like the BIG is planning to royally ***** these kids and probably profit themselves off their NIL.
 
Advertisement
Depends on whether there's a NDA included.

The fact that they don't want the template out however indicates foul play. The template is being roasted as we speak.
which is why I seriously doubt they'll escalate any of this out of fear of the specifics coming to light (especially before spring portal window)
 
Essentially the meat and potatoes of this, is that UW would own his NIL, give him a share (figure provided in the contract) but they’re able to sell those rights to a third party and the player doesn’t see any of that money? Am I reading that right? Also at their discretion, they can raise or lower the original amount (somehow the player is not an employee)? What a round about way of saying it’s performance based…
Exactly. Treat him like a private contractor but want to own him like an employee...
 
Question for the CIS lawyers: Since Wisconsin and the Big Ten don't want the template out, and assuming Lucas has a copy, is there anything legally stopping Lucas and Heitner from publishing it on Twitter?

Depends on the wording of the contract regarding making the document or terms public
 
Essentially the meat and potatoes of this, is that UW would own his NIL, give him a share (figure provided in the contract) but they’re able to sell those rights to a third party and the player doesn’t see any of that money? Am I reading that right? Also at their discretion, they can raise or lower the original amount (somehow the player is not an employee)? What a round about way of saying it’s performance based…
they've completely ****ed themselves and the B1G for the spring portal window

i get wanting to play for Oregon/Ohio State/Michigan/Penn State(maybe)

the rest, if this is what that conference has cooked up? nah
 
Back
Top