articles
Comments (473)
I can’t imagine Mario and his legal team didn’t vet this entire situation. Unless Lucas wasn’t truthful about what transpired, Wisky’s riding a slippery slope.
Don’t disagree. Just butt hurt but
Sounds like the SEC’s playoff cases
Have you heard of Dennis smith
So why would a student athlete sign a rev sharing agreement if it ties them in to a university with no ability to portal out?
Advertisement
Haha. Does UW really want to open this can of worms and have more scrutiny on them to repay any tampering allegations right back at them? I’m sure every kid who ever portalled into Wisconsin was on the up and up and followed the rules to a tee….
It’s going to be standard at least on a year basis - once rev share is actually in place. Yes Miami will have contracts too. Up to both sides how long they go for
Advertisement
Can always tell who the hall monitors were back in 2nd grade
Evan Flood looks like a ***. Go **** a cheese hole or cow
That statement got the UW pests back in my mentions.
Lol if they had any evidence of what they say Lucas wouldn't be enrolled at miami. Scare tactics don't work against big dogs
Advertisement
Litigators/ @DMoney a question about likely venue if this is litigated:
If UW pursued a breach of agmt action I might imagine it ends up in Wisconsin state court (not favorable for us).
But it sounds like UW/BIG would claim tampering, which is an NCAA rule. Given the NCAA oversees and makes rules for schools across the country I might imagine it would be litigated in federal court (more favorable for us).
Thoughts?
If UW pursued a breach of agmt action I might imagine it ends up in Wisconsin state court (not favorable for us).
But it sounds like UW/BIG would claim tampering, which is an NCAA rule. Given the NCAA oversees and makes rules for schools across the country I might imagine it would be litigated in federal court (more favorable for us).
Thoughts?
Not that Miami has perfect weather every day but...
Here's a potentially better question. This revenue sharing is coming as a result of the House v. NCAA settlement, which was a lawsuit seeking unpaid back pay for student athletes (and through which former student athletes are also receiving under the settlement). It will require revenue sharing.
So why would any student athlete need to sign anything to qualify for the revenue sharing? Seems to me they are already entitled to that $$$ by virtue of their playing a sport for the school.
Advertisement
Right...and the world didn't go cukoo for cocoa puffs in 2020 either... but yea I guess that was "Facebook groups " too...
I just don’t understand the remedy. Do they want to claim tortious interference? I don’t see damages, unless they want to be transparent and detailed about pay to play. Specific performance of personal services is out.
XL’S lawyer has said he did not receive any payment so unless he is lying, I’m not sure what they are out of on an agreement that is just an MOU with conditions that haven’t even been met yet on something that’s not even final yet
For all this drama, he better turn out to be Sean Taylor 
