Search results

We have had great success in the inferior ACC. This is brilliant.

What's your goal when you turn 15?

@CreativeCane ^ see above as to the actual debate.

That's not what the debate is about at all. That's what D$ keeps trying to focus on while avoiding the question.

If we had Arch they wouldn't have had Tyler out there playing like a corpse. Emory gave him a longer leash.

Your question was ill informed. Do better.

I do not think he would leave. That is the answer.

The top QBs usually transfer when a coach is fired or they lose a competion. The top QBs that transfer are not leaving because they changed their mind about the school. Rashada is an outlier not the norm.

You are selling CIS short. If we had Arch I don't think we pursue Ward as tirelessly as we did. And even if we do, we aren't having this conversation because that would have been the perfect way to conduct business.

I genuinelly thought you might want to know. I don't prefer it because opinions have probably changed. I do know that last year people were hyping up Elite 11 competitions and Emory and ****ting on Arch. I do enjoy a little violence from time to time.

I'm not arguing. I'm telling you how to find the info.

Well if you are not sure you should conduct a quick search.

The optics can't be worse than lying to a recruit about paying them money. Then landing a 5* the next cycle.

The picture has not been blurred. You just have people screaming loud noises to distract you from the point.

The QB is always worth it. The question is whether the staff trusts their ability to evaluate and develop.

This is not accurate. Miami QB situation stunk last year.

Probably not as real as the many on this board that have proclaimed Emory to be better than Arch.

I would say that having QB competition made both of those schools better.

Wouldn't the smarter play be to sign him out of HS or the portal 2 years ago? Right?