Search results

1. Our blue chip ratio is/was super young so it’s deceiving. Would Gundy, Stoops and Ferentz won those games? GT for sure. Same as if you or me were coaching. The other losses? Coin flip. 2. Lane Kiffin is a *****; no argument from me there. Lane Kiffin was a joke for a long time. Lane Kiffin...

Fair enough. I don’t watch enough Iowa/Ok St/UK games to offer a truly fair assessment on their X’s and O’s. I don’t think you would be far off if you said those coaches were all just paying players and recruiting was money based. They also are good coaches. Agree on Belichik’s defenses. Agree...

I wasn’t asking you. I was asking @WeBallinBoyz who wrote it. He can answer for himself as I was curious where he was coming from. That said, I completely disagree with you and your examples don’t make sense. Gundy, Ferentz and Stoops all coach at mediocre schools. Kentucky is a hoops school...

This has to be the most factually based, research backed, statistically relevant, non-emotional and still accurate post I’ve ever seen on CiS. Did you post to the wrong forum?

I agree with everything you wrote except for the highlighted/bolded part. My brain goes right to Brady/Belichik. I know one example does not prove or disprove a point, but can you explain a little more what you mean by this? Are you talking college only? I read it as meaning a good coach will...

He had a dialysis appointment today

FyZICaL!!!