Xavier Lucas wants to be in the portal but Luke Fickell pays to watch men ramrod his wife

I think spring ball will be important for our secondary. I think they have to be absolutely lights out to not bring in no one in the summer window assuming lucas comes.

To typically get that starter caliber depth, Guys have to be recruited in. Most starters arent transferring in to get beat out by zaquan, o Connor, etc.
They will be going up against Emory, a true Frosh in Nickel and Anderson. I'd say the secondary better be lights out but it's not a true barometer test. Mario and Hetherman have their work cut out for them to figure out who you can and cannot rely upon...
 
Advertisement
They will be going up against Emory, a true Frosh in Nickel and Anderson. I'd say the secondary better be lights out but it's not a true barometer test. Mario and Hetherman have their work cut out for them to figure out who you can and cannot rely upon...
I didnt think about that element. You're 💯 right. We wont know how good our D is until Beck is cleared.
 
They will be going up against Emory, a true Frosh in Nickel and Anderson. I'd say the secondary better be lights out but it's not a true barometer test. Mario and Hetherman have their work cut out for them to figure out who you can and cannot rely upon...
I just want the back end to build as much cohesion as possible. I imagine the groups totap confidence isn't the highest so going up against unproven qb's in spring might be a great thing to build that up before Beck is ready.
 
Timing aligns with what @TheOriginalCane told us. TOC doesn't post speculative stuff without disclaiming it as speculative. Something up.


Yes.

Sadly, we have some nitwit posters who choose to set their iPhone alarms so that they can come here to give people **** because certain things don't happen in the timeframe promised.

I am not claiming credit for this as if I am the only source of information. But I consistently said Gattis would be gone and had serious issues involved. I consistently said the Ward pursuit was not over even when he declared for the draft. More recently, I've been saying that Guidry was gone since November.

But we've got some posters who are impatient, and rather than saying "hey, it eventually happened", they want to constantly post gripes that it didn't happen fast enough.

So here's a simple question. What do people think is going to happen? Do they think Xavier Lucas will re-enroll at Wisconsin?

I'm an honest and direct person about these issues. I think there are some areas where Darren Heitner is an expert on the analysis of these issues. And there are other areas where I think Heitner should have taken action weeks ago, and it makes me wonder if he has studied all of the SUCCESSFUL lawsuits closely enough. Because getting emergency injunctive relief in NCAA cases has been a winner for the past few years. Easy money. Piece of cake.

I'm still hopeful we will get clarity today. Then all the dopey posters can turn off their Outlook reminders to go on CIS to ask why an earlier prediction has not happened fast enough.
 
Advertisement
I feel like a good lawyer could turn this into a suit against Wisconsin for ruining this kids chances at going to the school he wants to go to and missing out on NIL at that school. Not to mention the impact it has on his future
That's the point of this.

To ensure that Lucas spends so much on a lawyer that legal costs overwhelm any NIL that he would have received from Miami, Florida, or another suitor. And thus to serve as an abject lesson to other players.
 
I feel like a good lawyer could turn this into a suit against Wisconsin for ruining this kids chances at going to the school he wants to go to and missing out on NIL at that school. Not to mention the impact it has on his future
TBH he had a chance to go where he wanted to at first . Screwed up picking Wisconsin.
 
Advertisement
That's the point of this.

To ensure that Lucas spends so much on a lawyer that legal costs overwhelm any NIL that he would have received from Miami, Florida, or another suitor. And thus to serve as an abject lesson to other players.

The abject lesson to other players, especially south Florida kids is stay as far away from Wisconsin as possible. Wouldn't be surprised if his staff is banned from AH.
 
I feel like a good lawyer could turn this into a suit against Wisconsin for ruining this kids chances at going to the school he wants to go to and missing out on NIL at that school. Not to mention the impact it has on his future
There's the rub though, right? Miami won't sign a NIL deal with a student that's enrolled in another university for fear of "tampering." If he doesn't have a signed deal with another school that Wisconsin is interfering with, a cause of action becomes much more difficult. In other words, what evidence would he be able to rely on that another school would be willing to pay him more than he's making at Wisconsin? Some text messages that his agent received that someone might be willing to pay him more money? The case becomes much more speculative.

What is not difficult, is the case against Wisconsin for failing to put him in the portal. A writ of mandamus/injunction would solve the portal issue very quickly.
 
I feel like a good lawyer could turn this into a suit against Wisconsin for ruining this kids chances at going to the school he wants to go to and missing out on NIL at that school. Not to mention the impact it has on his future
I think he still has a case. Even if he goes to the school he wanted, it can be argued the illegal delays by Wisconsin cost him the ability to hit the open market during the winter enrollment window greatly reducing his ability to negotiate a new contract with all suitors.
 
I think he still has a case. Even if he goes to the school he wanted, it can be argued the illegal delays by Wisconsin cost him the ability to hit the open market during the winter enrollment window greatly reducing his ability to negotiate a new contract with all suitors.
The measure of damages would be what he got compared to what he could have received if they let him out earlier. How do you prove by the greater weight of the evidence what he could have received? I think it's a tough case.
 
Advertisement
The measure of damages would be what he got compared to what he could have received if they let him out earlier. How do you prove by the greater weight of the evidence what he could have received? I think it's a tough case.


His father said they received 40 offers. It might be possible to prove damages.
 
I feel like a good lawyer could turn this into a suit against Wisconsin for ruining this kids chances at going to the school he wants to go to and missing out on NIL at that school. Not to mention the impact it has on his future
But, but, but Darren Heitner is a Gator............................
 
His father said they received 40 offers. It might be possible to prove damages.
They are also getting close to him not being able to enroll for the Spring anywhere. I would imagine a good lawyer could spin that as something he should be compensated for as it affects him getting an education.
 
Advertisement
That's the point of this.

To ensure that Lucas spends so much on a lawyer that legal costs overwhelm any NIL that he would have received from Miami, Florida, or another suitor. And thus to serve as an abject lesson to other players.

Except there's other considerations from Wisconsin's perspective. Dragging an athlete who wants to leave through court is going to be a really bad look.

If they wanted to send a message, I don't think there's much more meat on the bone for them at this point and it actually increases the chances they choke on the bone.
 
And there are other areas where I think Heitner should have taken action weeks ago, and it makes me wonder if he has studied all of the SUCCESSFUL lawsuits closely enough.
The guy filed a breach of contract case against FSU bball coach Leonard Hamilton last week and asked for punitive damages....so, yea, you can draw your own conclusions from that.
 
They are also getting close to him not being able to enroll for the Spring anywhere. I would imagine a good lawyer could spin that as something he should be compensated for as it affects him getting an education.
That would have been the basis for the injunctive relief sought so you’d be walking a tight rope there. Injunctive relief cannot be issued when there is an adequate remedy at law (damages). So without thinking too deeply about it, I’d be inclined to think you don’t want to associate enrollment timelines with monetary damages. But it’s probably an academic point anyhow given the circumstances (request for injunctive relief seems unlikely at this point and he’ll either be entered into the portal or just enroll.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top