Xavier Lucas in the portal

Adding Xavier gives you so many options. Playing him at cb, Nickel , safety etc . So many options in that room. What a job of flipping the room.
Peoples Choice Awards GIF by NBC
 
Advertisement
Nice work “counselor”. You nailed how discrimination works. The plaintiff must be part of a protected class and the basis of the poor treatment must be because the plaintiff’s age, gender, religion, country of origin, etc…. Just because a woman is fired doesn’t mean it’s discrimination unless she was fired because she is a woman (protected class).

Your attorneys have taught you well. Better than many actual attorneys understand this issue.
what if I fired Caitlyn Jenner because she’s a woman?
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Losing Andy is going to be more important than anyone is realizing right now. Whoever is K1 in the spring better be under some immense pressure to make sure he can handle it next season.
I’m hoping spring rolls around to find a Hector / Tony / Chi-Chi Borregales on the roster. Hermano. Primo. Tio. Abuelo. Just find someone eligible with that bloodline.
 
Advertisement
with news of tim banks turning us down - we clearly don't have a DC set in place at the moment

to not lose anybody critical on that side of the ball and to get this defensive portal class to overhaul it, without a DC or position coaches in place is actually insane
Interesting on Banks. Had not heard that. Seems like a long shot from the get go.
 
Advertisement
with news of tim banks turning us down - we clearly don't have a DC set in place at the moment

to not lose anybody critical on that side of the ball and to get this defensive portal class to overhaul it, without a DC or position coaches in place is actually insane
I didn’t hear that he turned us down. Last I heard he was open to coming down to Miami. Did this just happen today?
 
It's not an irritation with you, as much as an exhaustion (at this point) of anyone trying to posit anything POSSIBLY VALID about what Wisconsin is doing.

1. You're wrong. Wisconsin is, and has been, refusing to process the paperwork. You can say "They can't", but they have absolutely been doing it. FOR WEEKS. The first step in getting to "four years" is by refusing to do something for four minutes, then four hours, then four days, then four weeks. If nobody fights it, then it will turn into four years.

2. He has already submitted the proper paperwork. He does not need to do so a second time. Your use of the word "may" doesn't fix your misunderstanding of the situation. He has done nothing wrong, he does not need to resubmit, he does not need to wait. He only needs his name to appear in the magical Portal website, and all will be good, and with dozens of other players entering the Portal soon, then he has not yet been "precluded" and does not have to wait until the second window.

3. You are just inventing hypotheticals that don't exist, so you can fight stupid arguments that are unnecessary. You cite a mythical "technicality you and I are unaware of" as some sort of McGuffin, but it's bull****. There is no technicality here. He didn't use a red ink pen when he should have used black or blue. That's not how this works. The Portal paperwork is shocking in its brevity and simplicity. Name, social, address, phone number, and you check the box for "No Contact" if you don't want every school to contact you. It's just that simple. I've actually seen what names look like in the Portal, there are no secret "technicalities".

Stop this nonsense.

It will all be resolved by Monday/Tuesday.

This is a fan message board where people of different backgrounds and levels of understanding can give and gain insight. One can only post with the information they have at their disposal and if you want to contribute that's great, but the condescending tone and unprovoked insults are unnecessary and unwelcome. People should be able to post in an open forum without this overly-aggressive board-commando behavior.

You inserted yourself in the middle of an exchange between two other people, then proceed to derail it with hair-parsing and misconstrued ideas about the basis under which the two people were having the dialogue to begin with. Your response speaks for itself but I welcome more positive contributions moving forward.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Back
Top