- Joined
- Jan 11, 2019
- Messages
- 5,239
That is all
Was a pretty **** good ACC this year. Still wild SMU joined and is going to the championship.
I don’t know how SMU did it with such a lowly ranked recruiting class and all of the money as a program Lashlee is not getting the way Mario is despite the Oil Money available to them.Was a pretty **** good ACC this year. Still wild SMU joined and is going to the championship.
So we played @4, @5, @6, 7 and 8 at home
FSU, Stanford, Nc St, Wake only guaranteed victories for us. Got 2 of 4 not bad, missed the top 2 also not bad. Teams with no qb's only ones we guaranteed to beat. Swap out GT for BC still probably lose. Syracuse for Pitt same.So we played @4, @5, @6, 7 and 8 at home
Clemson played @8 and 5 at home
SMU played @5 and @7
Love the unbalanced schedules, super cool
With a squad of Hurricane castoffs…Was a pretty **** good ACC this year. Still wild SMU joined and is going to the championship.
Porsting is harder.That is all
Winning is hard...................for losersThat is all
GT and Syracuse are bitter Hurricane losses.Yes winning is hard but you just don’t lose a game that puts you in a championship game especially an unraked team
AbsolutelyGT and Syracuse are bitter Hurricane losses.
And Mario, like Manny, Golden, and Shannon before him, are racking those "catastrophic" losses up...
None of that has anything to do with my comment, which is that we objectively had a more difficult path to the title than SMU and Clemson and with the size of conferences we have to get back to divisions. Not a cope, not an excuse, just a fact.FSU, Stanford, Nc St, Wake only guaranteed victories for us. Got 2 of 4 not bad, missed the top 2 also not bad. Teams with no qb's only ones we guaranteed to beat. Swap out GT for BC still probably lose. Syracuse for Pitt same.
That PA column says it all. Only Wake, Stanford, and NC State gave up more. If we were even average we’d walk into the playoffs and have a punchers chance.
Sure and my point is you could take the w's off cuse and gt and add them to bc and pitt if we played them. Semantics.None of that has anything to do with my comment, which is that we objectively had a more difficult path to the title than SMU and Clemson and with the size of conferences we have to get back to divisions. Not a cope, not an excuse, just a fact.