- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
- Messages
- 19,335
Figured I'd gauge our collective genius again to see who we think WILL start week 1 at QB.
Why do people want BK over Heaps? I want the guy who gives us the best chance of winning and don't care what he looks like or his name. Forget all the coach speak, might as well try and decipher tea leaves, but we weren't there in practice, film study, etc so we don't really know should start or how they've actually been doing overall.
I think Heaps too and they'll use the "it was soooooo close" rationale and state that Kaaya is capable and ready if needed. My issue with that is it being such a tight race shouldn't actually benefit the guy that's pushing Chris Weinke-dom in age.
I think Heaps too and they'll use the "it was soooooo close" rationale and state that Kaaya is capable and ready if needed. My issue with that is it being such a tight race shouldn't actually benefit the guy that's pushing Chris Weinke-dom in age.
Don't we just want the guy who gives us the best chance to win?
If in the coaches' minds Heaps is that guy - even by a small margin (i.e. "it was soooooo close") - then shouldn't we want Heaps taking the snaps? I don't understand why it matters in terms of who starts if the guy who's better by a hair is 16 or 26 or 96 years old.
Now I certainly understand the thinking that a guy that's played college ball for years and started games should have a clear advantage over a true freshman that just arrived, and therefore he should be able to beat him out by more than just a hair. But if he doesn't wipe the floor with the freshman but instead just edges him out, he still beat him out, right?
The close battle speaks more to me about Kaaya's trajectory than anything. It makes me think he has a chance to play a lot of ball here and help us win a lot of games. I see it as he's already so good that he's 1B to Chris Weinke-dom's 1A (this assumes Heaps gets the nod). Thing is, if Kaaya really is good, that means Heaps is just a bit better than that at this moment. But if Heaps isn't very good and he's still ahead of Kaaya, what does that say about Kaaya?
In any event, I'm saying play the guy who gives us the best chance to win NOW. I don't care if that guy gives us a little or a lot better chance than the other guy. All I care about right now is beating Louisville's *** on 9/1.
I think Heaps too and they'll use the "it was soooooo close" rationale and state that Kaaya is capable and ready if needed. My issue with that is it being such a tight race shouldn't actually benefit the guy that's pushing Chris Weinke-dom in age.
Don't we just want the guy who gives us the best chance to win?
If in the coaches' minds Heaps is that guy - even by a small margin (i.e. "it was soooooo close") - then shouldn't we want Heaps taking the snaps? I don't understand why it matters in terms of who starts if the guy who's better by a hair is 16 or 26 or 96 years old.
Now I certainly understand the thinking that a guy that's played college ball for years and started games should have a clear advantage over a true freshman that just arrived, and therefore he should be able to beat him out by more than just a hair. But if he doesn't wipe the floor with the freshman but instead just edges him out, he still beat him out, right?
The close battle speaks more to me about Kaaya's trajectory than anything. It makes me think he has a chance to play a lot of ball here and help us win a lot of games. I see it as he's already so good that he's 1B to Chris Weinke-dom's 1A (this assumes Heaps gets the nod). Thing is, if Kaaya really is good, that means Heaps is just a bit better than that at this moment. But if Heaps isn't very good and he's still ahead of Kaaya, what does that say about Kaaya?
In any event, I'm saying play the guy who gives us the best chance to win NOW. I don't care if that guy gives us a little or a lot better chance than the other guy. All I care about right now is beating Louisville's *** on 9/1.
You make valid points and at the end of the day all any of us are doing is analyzing (oft overanalyzing) coach-speak. Like you said, the debate does fall into a belief about Kaaya's trajectory. My belief is that if Kaaya is already soooooo close to a guy that probably doesn't have a huge potential upside then you roll with the guy that is going to progress over the season rather than the guy that might give you a slightly better edge in week 1. I think most in the Kaaya camp just don't see the point in rolling with the guy probably already showing you wayyyy more of his top potential than they guy almost matching the max potential of the veteran as an 18 yr old.
Again, this is all based on very sketchy data as the coaching staff very easily could only be spreading public sunshine about the QB competition so as to try to boost both guys confidence.